A closeup of some Jaws

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A closeup of some Jaws

Postby rflower on Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:44 pm

Another macro set, this time of pipe wrench with some interesting markings. 18-135mm Various Macro Extension rings. Pop-up Flash

Image

Image

Image

Image

What could I do to make these better?
Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G
I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower
If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
User avatar
rflower
Member
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:01 am
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne

Postby the foto fanatic on Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:20 am

Hi Russell
I don't like to see a thread like this go unanswered, so here goes:

- I think the DOF is very shallow. This is always an issue with macro photography, so you need to control lighting and camera settings to give you a deeper DOF. A tripod is usually recommended for macro photography, as this allows you to use a lower shutter speed.
- The pop-up flash is not ideal for this type of work. It gives a very flat result, and in pix like this one where there is texture involved, you need a larger light source to give a more wrap-around effect.
- Choose your subject carefully. Some things are just not that interesting, and unfortunately, this pipe wrench is one of them. I think you may have to either step back and photograph it in the context of a work-bench (in other words, not macro), or alternatively, go even closer and highlight smaller sections to portray shape and texture.

Hope this is helpful. :)
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Mr Darcy on Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:59 pm

I tend to agree with CricketFan, but I DO find that #2, #3 work for me.
Lack of context makes #1 fail, and the flash highlights detract rather than add to the exposure in #4
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Postby rflower on Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:18 pm

cricketfan wrote:Hi Russell
I don't like to see a thread like this go unanswered, so here goes:

- I think the DOF is very shallow. This is always an issue with macro photography, so you need to control lighting and camera settings to give you a deeper DOF. A tripod is usually recommended for macro photography, as this allows you to use a lower shutter speed.
- The pop-up flash is not ideal for this type of work. It gives a very flat result, and in pix like this one where there is texture involved, you need a larger light source to give a more wrap-around effect.
- Choose your subject carefully. Some things are just not that interesting, and unfortunately, this pipe wrench is one of them. I think you may have to either step back and photograph it in the context of a work-bench (in other words, not macro), or alternatively, go even closer and highlight smaller sections to portray shape and texture.

Hope this is helpful. :)


Thanks for the comments CricketFan. I have a SB-800 on my wish list, but popup flash was all I had available to me, and having only recently got the macro tubes, I am still practising / playing with them.

I think you are right about the subject. It looked interesting with different textures and colours, but to either go closer or further away would perhaps be more interesting.

Mr Darcy wrote:I tend to agree with CricketFan, but I DO find that #2, #3 work for me.
Lack of context makes #1 fail, and the flash highlights detract rather than add to the exposure in #4

Thanks also Mr Darcy. Appreciate the feedback
Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G
I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower
If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
User avatar
rflower
Member
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:01 am
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques