Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by aussichef on Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:57 pm
As the sun was setting over here in Port Vincent
I noticed alot of cherping coming from next doors trees
D80 in hand with 70-200vr & 1.4T C attached
all taken @ f4 1/100sec EV +.07
They wherent the easiest birds to capture,very quick little things i think there wattle birds but i'm sure someone will correct me
warren aka aussichef

Nikon D50/D80 Nikon,MB-D80 70-200 2.8 VR,Sigma 18-50 2.8, Kenko 1.4x TC, 2 kit lenses ,Nikon 50mm f1.8 Nikon SB-600 Tamron 90mm 2.8 Canon 500D closeup lens
-
aussichef
- Member
-
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:00 am
- Location: Port Vincent , and Tanunda South Australia,Australia
-
by ATJ on Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:50 pm
Warren,
I really like the first one. It is a stand out. The second and third lose a bit because of the foreground foliage obscuring part of the bird. The fourth is a bit blown by the sunlight. The last is not as sharp as the first.
The bird(s) is/are New Holland honeyeater(s), Phylidonyris novaehollandiae. Wattlebirds have wattles on each cheek.
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by Steffen on Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:17 am
Warren,
I like those, my favourites are #2 and #3. I'm not a big fan of textbook illustration poses, but rather see the birds going about what they're normally doing, and eating. I agree that the last one isn't quite as snappy as the rest.
Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
-

Steffen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: Toongabbie, NSW
by robert on Wed Sep 05, 2007 11:45 am
i like the first and thrid, woiuld really like the first if there was a little more saturation, but I guess the sun really hits those highlights a little out,
I think the bird may be a new holland honey eater?
Good opportune shots, before long you'll be identifying birds just from their calls!
Robert
-

robert
- Member
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
- Location: Sutherland, Sydney
by BT*ist on Wed Sep 05, 2007 1:26 pm
They're a really nice series. The first is a nice pose and sharp. The second maybe needs some contrast or more saturation. The third I really like, despite part of the bird being obscured it's a really nice pose. The colour in the fourth is brilliant, and I also like the way it's perched, though it suffers from looking a bit 'artifcial'. Fifth is okay - it's just a little more plain and the placement of the branch/limb in the background is a bit unfortunate.
Good stuff!
-

BT*ist
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
- Location: London, United Kingdom
by aussichef on Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:11 pm
You are so right about the second one lol i forgot to do any contrast or saturation i only cropped it
here it is with some contrast , saturation & usm hope it looks better
with so much work i am not getting a good workflow going
Id love to learn photoshop better than i know now
warren aka aussichef
Nikon D50/D80 Nikon,MB-D80 70-200 2.8 VR,Sigma 18-50 2.8, Kenko 1.4x TC, 2 kit lenses ,Nikon 50mm f1.8 Nikon SB-600 Tamron 90mm 2.8 Canon 500D closeup lens
-
aussichef
- Member
-
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:00 am
- Location: Port Vincent , and Tanunda South Australia,Australia
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|