How? Who? What?... Help!!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

How? Who? What?... Help!!

Postby fishafotos on Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:09 am

I have been hired to do my first model shoot (other than the crappy graduation/ball shooting i do at work) and I am pretty in-the-dark when it comes to this sort of shooting.

The shoot is for a wedding lingere brouchure as well as the front cover of a pack of stockings (I thought I'd just kill 2 birds with one stone and do both client's ads in the one shoot! Using different shots of course) this is the 1st outfit we recieved so this 1st shoot is just a test run. I will have the opportunity to change anything I want for the rest of the outfits in the brouchure.
This is one of the 1st shots, it is the only one i have fully processed so far and I am fairly happy with it but i think it has far more potential, i just don't know how to access it.
I tried lots of lighting setups when i did them so i have lots of similar shots with different lighting if anyone thinks that could be the issue.

This is the attempt:

Image

Shot with the D80, 17-55/2.8, 2 studio strobes (bought from Ronza's eBay store), one with a lightbox and one with an umbrella. The umbrella strobe was set to be 10 times more powerful than the lightbox in this shot so i could get the one-sided light and shadows.

Any help/comments/critisisms would be greatly appreciated

Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby shakey on Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:47 am

I know you've gone the high key approach but maybe make it a bit more obvious that there is a bit of bra on her (anatomically) left side.

Not the sort of shot I do so feel free to disagree... :) :) :)
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby fishafotos on Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:56 am

Thanks for the quick reply, unfourtunately she did not quite fit the bra ( she was a little smaller in the bust department) so at certain angles (this being one of them) there is a bit of space between her and the bra. I was trying to cover it up by blowing it out but I still don't think it looks right.
I'll definately be giving fixing it a shot though. Thanks

Harry

EDIT: The hi-key bit is from my pp, the originals are actually slightly under-exposed soi can easily go for a different approach if people think it would look better.
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby gstark on Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:52 am

A brief comment on the high-key approach if I may ....

Consider that, from your introduction to this shoot, the goal here is to highlight the lingerie. Is it then appropriate that the product be blown in the highlights as you have done in this image?

What does your client expect? Satisfying that need should be your primary objective.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby fishafotos on Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 am

Absolutley, pleasing the client is, as always, my main objective.
I agree, the High-Key approach is not a good idea.
Any suggesions on how to best go about it in a non-high key way. The backdrop is horrible, tape all over it, all crinkly so i just used the dodge tool to get rid of it. Is there any way of getting rid of it in the same sort of way, without having to cut her out?
Burn tool set on highlights?

Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby NJ on Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:46 pm

the burn tool on highlights only makes the highlights turn grey and horrible. Have u thought of going for the exact opposite and doing low-key using a black backdrop?
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby Matt. K on Wed Jun 13, 2007 6:42 pm

Take off white shoes, put on red shoes. Otherwise.....quite good. You are on the right track.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby fishafotos on Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:47 pm

Yeah, i might go for a black backdrop next time.

Matt, She's not wearing shoes. They are the stockings, the ad is for the stockings so i didn't want anything to distract from them.

I will try and get a black backdrop for the next one.

Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques