some of my latest stuff

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

some of my latest stuff

Postby jamesw on Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:53 pm

a couple of weekends ago i was shooting for a interview in a bmx mag, got some really good shots that i was happy with.

here are a few that didnt make the cut for publishing, i still really liked them...

Image
1/400, f7.1, 10.5 fisheye, two flash off camera on pws.


Image
1/400, f11, 20mm f2.8, two flash off camera on pws.

Image
1/160, f5, 20mm f2.8, two flash off camera on pws.
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby jamesw on Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:56 pm

also, please excuse the average jpeg compression. these were the low res proofs sent to the editor, i couldnt be bothered re-downsizing them...
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby Reschsmooth on Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:14 pm

James, whilst they are great shots and show a good use of off-camera flash, can I ask that you refrain from mentioning PocketWizards to assist me in avoiding additional kit-lust?? :lol: :lol:

Seriously, great shots, although the first is a little compromised by the sunlight.

Cheers
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby rookie2 on Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:29 pm

good stuff James - I really like #3 ..an edgy capture - is he going to end up in the drink?

what mag will your other work be in? I'll keep an eye out for it.

well done

R2
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA

Postby Pehpsi on Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:32 pm

Great stuff, love the bail in #3. The others must be pretty sweet if these didn't make the cut :) Will they be online anywhere to look at?

And also a newbie question, what is a PWS?

Cheers.
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Postby jamesw on Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:32 pm

rookie2 wrote:good stuff James - I really like #3 ..an edgy capture - is he going to end up in the drink?

what mag will your other work be in? I'll keep an eye out for it.

well done

R2


the mag is called focal point.

i have a shot of #3 where he isn't falling off.... its getting published 8) he didnt end up in the water, though!
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby jamesw on Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:13 pm

Pehpsi wrote:Great stuff, love the bail in #3. The others must be pretty sweet if these didn't make the cut :) Will they be online anywhere to look at?

And also a newbie question, what is a PWS?

Cheers.


the mags website is http://www.focalpointbmx.com
but i dont think they publish the articles online

after the mag comes out i'll put a few more up.

a PW is a pocketwizard. nifty little radio triggers. they are pricey but worth every cent...
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby seeto.centric on Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:16 pm

two words: HELMET FOOL!
all those safety people are lecturing about the importance of helmets, yet these guys are being featured in a major mag, riding and stunting helmetless!

back on track, nice shots mate. composition and lighting is tops. i had a play with off camera flash the other evening, but that was my first attempt haha ive got a lot to learn.

dont you feel a bit worried he might stuff something up and err.. land on say, a flash?

-j
User avatar
seeto.centric
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills/2153. Sydney

Postby jamesw on Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:16 am

sometimes i get a little worried about riders hittiing flashes... thats why i have 7 or 8 of the things :D
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby tasadam on Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:16 am

Nice captures, but
seeto.centric wrote:two words: HELMET FOOL!

Agreed!
Share what you know, learn what you don't.
Wilderness Photography of Tasmania http://www.tasmaniart.com.au
User avatar
tasadam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania

Postby jamesw on Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:23 am

tasadam wrote:Nice captures, but
seeto.centric wrote:two words: HELMET FOOL!

Agreed!


helmets, like seatbelts, are for sissies :wink: :lol: :lol:
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby tasadam on Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:35 am

I know what you mean... Reminds me of a photo I saw in a motorcycle magazine once, some guy on his motorbike on a public street doing a great one handed wheelie while waving to the camera, and he was completely naked :shock:
Clearly no self respect in more ways than one... :roll:
Share what you know, learn what you don't.
Wilderness Photography of Tasmania http://www.tasmaniart.com.au
User avatar
tasadam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania

Postby jamesw on Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:59 am

tasadam wrote:I know what you mean... Reminds me of a photo I saw in a motorcycle magazine once, some guy on his motorbike on a public street doing a great one handed wheelie while waving to the camera, and he was completely naked :shock:
Clearly no self respect in more ways than one... :roll:


in all seriousness, something about wearing a helmet in a photo ruins the photo - it takes away from it somehow.

i know how UN-PC (pol correct) that statement is, but i dont really care. as a rider, i appriciate a photo far more if the guy isnt wearing a helmet.

makes it look gnarlier or something.

i do wear a helmet whilst riding down the street, i hate fines.
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby methd on Fri Jun 08, 2007 1:01 pm

agreed. if he can do stunts and execute them over and over without a helmet, then he MUST be pro ! there's a higher risk (especially for motorcycle stunts) so it just appeals as it appears they have more skills and/or balls !
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby jamesw on Fri Jun 08, 2007 1:09 pm

i might add that i never encourage a rider to wear or not wear a helmet. its up to them.
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques