Nocturnal Bird

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Nocturnal Bird

Postby DanielA on Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:32 pm

I went into the Adelaide Zoo today (yes, I know it's the third zoo visit in two weeks). This time it was with a tripod and Sigma 150mm f/2.8 macro lens.

Here's one bird from the nocturnal house:
ImageImage
1s f/5.6 iso200
Converted to b&w since it was only light by blue light.

I forgot to note down its name, so if anyone can give be an ID, that would be great.

The rest of my close up shots are in my gallery.


Daniel
Nikon D4, D2Xs, D70, Nikkors and Sigmas lenses from 10 to 400mm
www.DSAimages.com
User avatar
DanielA
Senior Member
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby Pehpsi on Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:40 pm

Very cool stuff..I like the shot on the right better. Did it take many attempts to get these shots, or did (s)he stay still and not cause too much trouble?

:)
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Postby Quilb on Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 pm

I love it. I wish i could do that many trips to a zoo. i went last weekend and most of my pictures are blurred due to slow shutter speeds used because of the low light. I agree with Pehpsi, the one on the right looks better to me.
Quilb
Newbie
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Central Coast, NSW

Postby ATJ on Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:47 am

I prefer the right shot, too, but both photographs are great.

Note that the bird is a frogmouth (perhaps a tawny frogmouth) and they are related to nightjars.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby DanielA on Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:27 pm

Thank you all.
I'm interested to see everyone likes the one on the right better. Normally eye contact is an important part (at least for the big cats).

Pehpsi wrote:Did it take many attempts to get these shots, or did (s)he stay still and not cause too much trouble?

No, it was very still. I went past it the first time because I thought it was stuffed! I only went back because another visitor mentioned it.
I was able to get quite a few (long exposure) frames off. Only a few were blurred because of head movement. It did fly off at one stage but came back before I had moved on.

Quilb wrote:i went last weekend and most of my pictures are blurred due to slow shutter speeds used because of the low light.

This was the first time I've taken a tripod in. It makes life so much easier, even if I do find tripods annoying and restrictive.

ATJ wrote:Note that the bird is a frogmouth (perhaps a tawny frogmouth) and they are related to nightjars.

Ah, I thought it looked familiar. Thanks.

Daniel
Nikon D4, D2Xs, D70, Nikkors and Sigmas lenses from 10 to 400mm
www.DSAimages.com
User avatar
DanielA
Senior Member
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby aussichef on Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:54 am

Very nice daniel
i like the one on the right also i too believe eye contact is important
I wish i lived in Adelaide instead of 200klm away .As i too would make as many visits in 2 weeks
not to go off topic too much but you have the 80-400vr don't you ??
its tax time again so time for a new lens & i think this is my next buy
are u happy with it ???
warren aka aussichef
Nikon D50/D80 Nikon,MB-D80 70-200 2.8 VR,Sigma 18-50 2.8, Kenko 1.4x TC, 2 kit lenses ,Nikon 50mm f1.8 Nikon SB-600 Tamron 90mm 2.8 Canon 500D closeup lens
aussichef
Member
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:00 am
Location: Port Vincent , and Tanunda South Australia,Australia

Postby Big V on Thu Jun 07, 2007 12:47 pm

Daniel, the one on the right for me..boy you are making good use of the card. Nice idea with the tripod in the noccy house
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:30 pm

Yeah the onne on the right looks best.....great stuff!
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby DanielA on Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:51 pm

Thanks everyone.

Big V wrote:boy you are making good use of the card. Nice idea with the tripod in the noccy house

I've been wanting to take some shots in the reptile house for some time, and this was the first chance. It was good, but still tricky. You have to allow lots of time.

aussichef wrote: not to go off topic too much but you have the 80-400vr don't you ??
its tax time again so time for a new lens & i think this is my next buy
are u happy with it ???

Another purchase! :shock:
You won't be able to carry all your stuff.

Yes I've got the 80-400vr and think it's great. I don't have a fast 70-200, but at the long end nothing beats it for price and size.

Daniel
Nikon D4, D2Xs, D70, Nikkors and Sigmas lenses from 10 to 400mm
www.DSAimages.com
User avatar
DanielA
Senior Member
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby aussichef on Fri Jun 08, 2007 1:25 am

I love my 70-200 vr Daniel
But find lack of reach sometimes, with nature shots mainly hard to sneak up on birds & other animals in the wild out here in the country to a certain extent
different in the zoo lol
just wish i could afford it before i go on a weeks holidays @ the beginning of July up to Warraweena in the Flinders for a national explore oz meet
warren aka aussichef
Nikon D50/D80 Nikon,MB-D80 70-200 2.8 VR,Sigma 18-50 2.8, Kenko 1.4x TC, 2 kit lenses ,Nikon 50mm f1.8 Nikon SB-600 Tamron 90mm 2.8 Canon 500D closeup lens
aussichef
Member
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:00 am
Location: Port Vincent , and Tanunda South Australia,Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques