




Botanic imagesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Botanic imagesWent for a stroll through the Botanic Gardens this afternoon and gave my new Canon 70-200 F4 lens a workout in overcast/dappled light. I stayed on F4 all afternoon and used a tripod to keep things steady. (Wife carried tripod, a good deal...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
max nice images....... have you tried tighter crops for a different look
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Not yet Bernie, haven't had time. I suppose these flowers have been photographed a million times but I always enjoy them. The 70-200 lens is razor sharp and a lot of fun to shoot with.
Fraser President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
the isolation of the flower/s created by the contrast bathed in that slip of gorgeous light against that dark background is so poignant and beautiful,
a lovely mystique and gentlesness is most evident in the 1st 2 2nd one being the best great work!
Thanks for the comment Wendell, yes I think #2 is my fav. I had thought it might have been better without the 2nd flower, but then again, twin flowers are maybe more interesting than just a single stem. Ozi.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Number 1 and 2 are just gorgeous the natural lighting and isolation are just perfect maybe a tighter crop on the first.
No Dave, I couldn't afford the IS version, but I like using a tripod so no problems there. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Great shots. # 1 is so simple and effective, #3 great composition.
Craig ![]() Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|