


And just a 30 second exposure.

Cheers
Adam
Painting with light take 2Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Painting with light take 2Hi guys was so impressed by the painting with light technique i went out and had a go at the local sculpture symposium..
![]() ![]() ![]() And just a 30 second exposure. ![]() Cheers Adam Please don't use or edit my images.
D200x2, kit lens, Sigma 105mm f2.8, Nikkor 50mm F1.4, SB600, SB800, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 1.4x TC, 2x TC, Sigma 120-300 f2.8
Adam
I didn't comment on your first painting with light shots since I figured it was just an expermient with what I saw were pretty ordinary subjects. I'm commenting now since I can see that eperiment coming to fruition. These first three are excellent implementations of your technique and make for very strong images. Number one works best since we still have some sky detail to anchor the object nicely. The last one isn't quite in the same league. It has the detail I liked in the bakground for #1, but is let down compositionally - the tree in the middle is a distraction and the sculpture on the right is not well balanced by those on the left. I look forward to more of these as you get better with the technique. Thanks for sharing these. makes me want to try the same myself. Edit: I've just seen Wendell's comment above re: #4 - it just shows how subjective this stuff is eh ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
HAhah yeah opinions are like you know what!!! everyone has one
![]() Thanks for the comments guys, im mega happy with lastnights shots and find myself thinking more and more about exposure and composition, i only took about 15 pics all up lastnight and i would call all bar one keepers....This is definetly a technique i can see myself using more and more as it can give everyday landscapes/objects a new lease of life and has a much better graphic quality than a standard flash shot. Cheers Adam Please don't use or edit my images.
D200x2, kit lens, Sigma 105mm f2.8, Nikkor 50mm F1.4, SB600, SB800, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 1.4x TC, 2x TC, Sigma 120-300 f2.8
Fantastic really. You've picked the subjects well and then transformed them into a work of art that I bet the sculptor never imagined.
Brilliant work. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Hi Adam,
the 1st and last images are in my view very very good. Composition, illumination, object(s) and sky with stars => very ![]() Cheers, CD
Really like the 1st and last one
The 1st one looking very alien in a deserted environment and the last one because of the sharp shadows and produced from the lighting. Really creates an atmosphere
#3 is fantastic, so eerie. Only niggle is the slight halo from sharpening, other than that it's brilliant.
Edit: I actually meant the last, only 3 images loaded earlier ![]() Last edited by rooboy on Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
I really like #1 here. The whole monolith against the starry sky thing is quite eerie and you've done it really well with your newly discovered technique. I would prefer to see the centred composition a little bit more centred.
![]() #4 isn't bad but seems a touch noisy compared to #1, and I think I prefer the dark foreground as it isolates the subject nicely. There you are, now you have another opinion to consider. ![]() Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
Great series Adam. #1 and the last are my picks here. Wonderful feel to them very '2001 a Space Odyssey' feel to them. Certainly makes me want to have a go at this imaging process when I travel out western q'ld in the next week and a half.
![]() ![]() cheers marco
Great picturesGreat pictures! The last one is a bit too dark for my taste, but I think is still very good.
Sculptures on the hill. Very well done Adam. I like #1 best and I think you should do a large print for hanging in the tourist centre. Iam sure they would be interested.
Craig ![]() Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|