
W a i k i k i ~ s u n s e tModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Very nice!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
can't really take a bad pic when you're in such a great location
![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Dee
There is lots to like about this image and I'd have been proud to have taken it, but.... I think there is a little too much foreground and it dominates the image too mich for me. I'd be tempted tp crop a small amount from the bottom to remove the second rail (or whatever it is) This would preserve the strong leading lines in the shot, but lessen the foreground impact. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I first thought the same thing stubbsy, however after a few minutes, I like it the way it is.
Why? Well, this beach is commercial, commercial, commercial. Its not overly picturesque. So by having the subject, or impact in the foreground, it nicely leads the eye away from the hotels neon lights, enjoying the soft water, and peaceful colors. Also, the framing is well done including the second water break (concrete thing).
thanks for the critiques.
i wanted to stay away from a traditional waikiki at night shot. i chose this crop b/c of the 30 second exposure making the water look abnormally calm. so the lines to the city plus the blurred water were my highlights of the shot, even thouhg the photo is all about the city skyline.
Dee, I've been following your Waikiki / Honolulu images via my Flickr contact page - all are stunning. Keep up the good work!
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|