Canon 30D with Canon 70-200 2.8L with 1.4x - Heavily Cropped


Couple of Cricket shotsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Couple of Cricket shotsTook a couple of shots while i was playing cricket. I was quite happy with these two.
Canon 30D with Canon 70-200 2.8L with 1.4x - Heavily Cropped ![]() ![]()
On the second shot I'm really supprised that the bails came off before the ball got there. I think we need the third umpire in for this shot....
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() In both shots, the ball, the seam and the shadow on the ball look identical to me.. Perhaps I'm wrong..but so was GWB about WMD.. ![]() Last edited by shakey on Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Great shots. I have been trying to take good shots of my team with mixed results.
The 2nd is best, although, with the first, someone should tell point that he should be walking in with the bowler. ![]() P
I hope not... the usual situation in cricket is that the bails don't come off before the ball hits the wicket or the wicketkeeper attempts a stumping.
Hmmm..so how do you explain the bails coming off before the ball hitting the wicket...? I can't work it out.... ![]() ![]() ![]()
My guess would be spin bowler - the ball may not have enough speed to go through the stumps, but just bounces off, hence the very upward trajectory of the bails. If that is right, poor choice of shot. If I am wrong, well, go Australia ![]() P
Thats pretty much my explation. The stumps were in the ground quite tightly. Definately no photoshops here guys. ![]()
Haven't you seen the text book "How not to bat" (written by an Englishman, methinks).
In the first, the left elbow needs to be a tad higher, in the second, the batsman played the wrong line I think, use the feet and get down the pitch son...
![]() Nice clear shots. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Wow!! Great shots Nick. I was going to post a photo I took last weekend with bails in a similar position to the 2nd, but these make mine look very ordinary indeed
![]() The lusting continues unabated... Craig - Canon 350D, EF-S 18-55, EF 70-300
Sweet. It's that time of year again
![]() The second shot is fantastic. Your timing is brilliant, but the batsman's is shocking. ![]() It's hard to get good images of cricket even with a 500mm lens, so i reckon you have done really well to get them. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|