Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by adam on Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:53 pm
Yesterday, I had the opportunity with 2 of my friends to cover a wedding.
It was a great (and tiring) experience (all day, from morning preparation to reception at night). Now I've got sore arms and legs  haha.
I want to share a few photographs from the park. My friend did much of the directing, but overall, it was very natural - the happiness was all there, all smiley, flowed well.
As you may know, my camera is out of action, my friend lent me his 300D
Here's a few images:
#1
#2
#3
#4 
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
-

adam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
- Location: New Caledonia
-
by cawdor on Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:51 pm
Hi Adam,
I like shot 4, nicely blurred background. Would be perfect if the flowers could have been in focus as well - but then you may not have gotten the background blurred
The challenge with any sunny outdoor shoot is getting no blown highlights, hard to do with a white wedding dress! You managed it nicely on the right hand side of number 3, the lower left side is blown unfortunately and the eyes of the bride are closed. Natural smiles are most important and that has been achieved.
Time for you to recover now 
Tim D300 | D200 | F90x | 70-200 f2.8 VR | Tamron 90 f2.8 Macro | Tokina 12-24 f4 | Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Macro | Nikon SB-800
-
cawdor
- Member
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:00 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
by PiroStitch on Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:18 pm
i like the last one a lot, but as has been mentioned about the DOF with the bouquet in focus as well. Also maybe make the skin tone a bit warmer in the last pic as her face is a tad blue.
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by adam on Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:54 pm
Thanks cawdor and pirostitch for the replies!  I appreciate them very much.
Cawdor pointed out the difficulty I had - because the sun was so bright, and the bride wears white and the groom wears black. It was rather tricky. Especially with the sun causing harsh shadows.
On the larger image - her eyes are open, but look closed on the small image - and I do also think that maybe she is making them smaller because of the bright light from the car-windshield-reflector
Pirostitch: Someone else also pointed out on my other photographs that my white-balance was out. I'll have a go fixing them. I usually shoot raw so it's easy easy to fix, but now with this JPEG, I need to learn!
thanks!
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
-

adam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
- Location: New Caledonia
-
by Technik on Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:00 pm
My pick would have to be #1, you captured the exact right moment! I absolutely love it, well done 
D70s/D200; Tokina 16-50mm 2.8; 18-70DX ; 50mm 1.8 ; 80-200mm 2.8D ; SB600 + Stofen Omini Bouncer
-
Technik
- Member
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:35 pm
- Location: Sutherland Shire, Sydney
by Alex on Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:07 pm
No. 1 has a very nice spontaneous/ candid feel to it. Very well done, espcially considering tough lighting conditions with strong sunlight.
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by adam on Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:14 pm
My only *thing* which I was a bit worried about for #1 was the head behind the bride  I don't know whether it's a good or bad thing  but I'll have a go removing it later and see how it looks. (I'm not a cloning-fan, but I think it'll be interesting!)
Thanks for the replies
edit: I have replaced the last photograph with a slightly warmer photograph.
I wasn't sure how to adjust the white balance - is it by using curves on the different colour channels? So instead I just applied a warming filter in photoshop.
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
-

adam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
- Location: New Caledonia
-
by owen on Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:40 am
Hi Adam. I really like the first image, and didn't even notice the head behind the bride until you pointed it out. I think because there is so much 'action' going on in it that it keeps my attention focused on the b&g
-

owen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
- Location: Nowra, NSW
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|