Night shot practice

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Night shot practice

Postby kazuhiro on Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:49 am

Hi guys,

Any comments on how I could improve would be great.

Image


Image


Image
kazuhiro
Newbie
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby Bigfoot1966 on Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:45 am

What would you want to improve,
Look great to me ! :D
Bigfoot1966
Newbie
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: Quinns Rock WesternAustralia

Postby Kyle on Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:57 am

Nice work there Paul :):)

Love the first one, what location is that?
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:36 am

First one is my favourite, the treatment and exposure are great.

The second one seems to lack a point of interest, so it's as strong for me.

The third shot seems to suffer from camera/building shake, it lacks sharpness.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Andyt on Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:46 pm

kazuhiro,

Top one as said is great!, if it was me, and I wanted to "improve" it, if you have PS, the top seems a touch over exposed, and the bottom is a little under exposed, (losing detail).

I would reshoot with a tripod, first shot expose for the top half, second shot expose for the bottom half, and then merge the two in PS. Or use a similar technique to get a more even exposure and picking up on the detail lost above.

Great subject with "atmosphere", does it for me! :lol:

edit: Nicely framed with the tree branches in the foreground
User avatar
Andyt
Member
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:17 pm
Location: Port Hedland North Western Australia

Postby marcotrov on Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:13 pm

#1 and #2 are lovely Kazuhiro. In #1 I'd have been tempted to include the top(spire) of the cathedral/church to add interest and sense of completion.
In #2 I would crop left and right side so that you just see the lane way.

To shoot again I'd use a tripod as Andyt has suggested (the image needs to be sharper), or a steadier one if you used one, hang a bag between the legs of your tripod to stabilise it, and perhaps get a friend to be walking (away) down the tight lane way, bottom third of the image in either a complementary or very contrasting coloured outfit e.g. rted jacket or skirt :wink:

cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Colcam on Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:35 pm

Okay kazuhiro, if you want some critique, I will have a go. My first reaction on No.1 was really good, but I do have a soft spot for sepia as 90 % of my work is sepia, but after looking deeper, I would either burn in the highlight areas in Photoshop or give it a touch in Highlights and Shadows if you have P.S. CS2. If so, work your shadows up a little and the highlights down, but don't forget to slip the midtone contrast up some too or it will get a little flat. I could live without the spire, but the top of the lit portion of the front wall would have been better included in its entirety along with the step in front. i.e. zoom back a little. Andyt's idea is sound too. Multiple, varied exposures and blend them if you have CS2.

I like the misty look inside the front doorway though. Obviously always work on a tripod for this sort of low light stuff. The resulting crispy bits willl make it worth all the trouble.

Loved the light & the mood in No.2 but it screams for a couple in love strolling up or down there. I may have even tried to lose the long black lampost in the left foreground if I thought it worth the trouble to me, but nice just the same.

No. 3 leaves me cold, I am afraid. Nothing holding my eye in there and I find the Lumley sign distractiong, but not interesting enough to be the subject of my attention. Tripod or beanbag to steady the camera too.

Lets see some more.
Col
User avatar
Colcam
Member
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Pomona, Qld.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques