
This one is a silhoutte

This one is pretty plain



Wanted to test my Sigma 70-200 f2.8 more than anything else. C&C are welcome.
Thanks
Alex
PlanesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
PlanesCould not think of much to shoot today so went to a place near Melbourne airport and shot some place (with the camera)
![]() This one is a silhoutte ![]() This one is pretty plain ![]() ![]() ![]() Wanted to test my Sigma 70-200 f2.8 more than anything else. C&C are welcome. Thanks Alex
Alex
I really like #1 because it's so different to the average run of the mill plane shot. The other two though don't grab me. They are technically good, but there isn't any feeling of motion to them. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I agree with Peter here, Alex. The first one is very impressive. 2 and 3 are a bit run-of-the-mill (sort of shot I'd take!)
![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanks, guys. Peter and Simon - agree completely, the last two are pretty plain. I like the first one also.
Cheers Alex
the first is definitely a different plane shot.
wonder if it is a deliberate silhouette or more a result of an accident? steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Thanks, YiP and Steve.
Steve, this one was certainly no accident. I took a few normal 'run-of-the-mill' shots, like 2 and 3, then I realised they are nothing special and desided since it is a sunny day I will try shooting against the sun and see if I can get a decent silhoutte. As a result, I only got one decent shot out of about 40. Another example, which I don't like, is below. ![]() Alex
Alex, #1 also does it for me. A great silhoutte shot.
You got pretty close. Didn't have any trouble with security? Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
John, No problems at all. I was at aircraft viewing area which is outside of airport and is like a car park. Plenty of people watching and some taking photos with p&s. Last night I was about to drive to the nearest oil refinery at night to take night shots, then I realised that I also had 4 glasses of wine for dinner and decided to give it a go. This one might put me in contact with security guys ![]() Alex
The first one does it for me. The clouds add to the pic nicely
![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Wayne, Thanks. No TC, they were flying low enough ![]() Cheers Alex
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|