Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by wendellt on Thu May 25, 2006 8:37 pm
some experimentation with a fashion show, i have seen some lovely examples of panning on a runway i thought i'd try it myself
here is me panning,
manual f20 ISO100 shutter: 1/2, moved the camera left to right vigorously in some cases zooming in and out with the 28-70
this works best if the background has more ambient light
more here
http://www.zeduce.org/fashion/mafw06syd/arty.htm
.
.
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Trieu on Thu May 25, 2006 8:38 pm
Sorry to ask the obvious, but what exactly is panning?
Cheers, Trieu 30D and TWO L's
-

Trieu
- Member
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:36 pm
- Location: Sydney's West Canon 30D
by wendellt on Thu May 25, 2006 8:46 pm
Trieu wrote:Sorry to ask the obvious, but what exactly is panning?
it's when you follow a moving object with the camera
in most cases ti works when you use a slow shutterspeed so your camera is tracking the moving object rendering it in clear view but it also captures trails
depending on how you pan.
In motorsport if you pan in a certain way you can get a moving car sharp and capture motion trails in the background
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Geoff on Thu May 25, 2006 8:49 pm
Wendell - I have to be honest with you, I don't think this style suits fashion photography as it makes it more difficult to see exactly what the model is wearing. It's a different technique though, that's for sure.
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Trieu on Thu May 25, 2006 8:51 pm
Thanks for the info Wendell 
Cheers, Trieu 30D and TWO L's
-

Trieu
- Member
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:36 pm
- Location: Sydney's West Canon 30D
by wendellt on Thu May 25, 2006 8:55 pm
Geoff wrote:Wendell - I have to be honest with you, I don't think this style suits fashion photography as it makes it more difficult to see exactly what the model is wearing. It's a different technique though, that's for sure.
i just need to experiment from time to time
as runway can get very monotanous at times
i share because i love experimentation and the colour tones, apart form that there isn't much merit in them
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by mark on Thu May 25, 2006 8:56 pm
Arty, I think it looks best as trailing as in the third and fourth images you can see both the effect and the clothing.
I like the effect though.
-

mark
- Member
-
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:56 am
- Location: Byron Bay | Northern NSW
-
by owen on Thu May 25, 2006 8:57 pm
Hi Wendell. Of all of these I think the second works best because you can see her face somewhat, and the streaks seem to work for me.
The others I am not too fussed about.
Cheers,
Owen.
-

owen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
- Location: Nowra, NSW
-
by sirhc55 on Thu May 25, 2006 9:46 pm
Wendell - you experiment to your hearts content  My favourite is the last shot. It looks as if an angel is walking the boards 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Yi-P on Thu May 25, 2006 10:29 pm
Last one, you made her burning hot!! She's flaming!!
I've only tried the zoom panning, but not this way of moving the camera around like crazy.. gotta try this one day
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by Alex on Fri May 26, 2006 8:31 pm
Wendell,
Like No.2 and the last one especially. Great work,
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by ONV73C on Sat May 27, 2006 2:24 am
Nice experiment... like the last one especially. You could create some really cool effects with some PP on these.
Had a browse through your site, some great work on there. Am quite interested in persuing this type of photography. Typically what sort of setup do you use for runway photography? lense/flash type etc any other equip?
Michael
"You are talking about the nonsensical ravings of a lunatic mind"
-

ONV73C
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:49 am
- Location: Sydney - Leichhardt
by Manta on Sat May 27, 2006 10:35 am
I can see this as a useful technique for some fashion shoots, though not something that would ever take over from the more mainstream styles of glamour photography.
I agree with the comments already made here Wendell - some captivating images. Keep playing with it!
-

Manta
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
-
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: Hamilton Qld
-
by tasadam on Sat May 27, 2006 10:42 am
I like the last one - the bold colours and the extra statement of movement - great.
Is this with flash as well - rear sync?
-

tasadam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania
-
by marcotrov on Sat May 27, 2006 10:48 am
Good on you for trying new things Wendell. I really like #4 and #3. I can just see the accompanying article - The Catwalk Hustle
#2 would easily fit into a promotional poster for Smallville
cheers
marco
-
marcotrov
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia
by wendellt on Sat May 27, 2006 12:27 pm
ONV73C wrote:Nice experiment... like the last one especially. You could create some really cool effects with some PP on these.
Had a browse through your site, some great work on there. Am quite interested in persuing this type of photography. Typically what sort of setup do you use for runway photography? lense/flash type etc any other equip?
Michael
Hi Michael
the 70-200VR is the choice of most runway photographers to get tight and full length for both canon and nikon camps
but i prefer the ease of the 85mm f1.4, some times for arty stuff a wider lens is required like a 28-70 so you can get full length and some of the background audience more of the staging etc
for the 70-200 vr you will need a monopod a flash bracket and a flash but usually i shot available light
high iso capable body is important too so in this instance a canon body is better than nikon as you can shoot comfortably at ISO1200 with minimal noise
and a whole stack of large CF cards is handy
tasadam I use the rear sync flash on the last one, but since the distance of the subject is far the effect was negligable
thanks everyone for the comments, this experimentation clearly requires more attempts to get right
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by glamy on Sat May 27, 2006 7:11 pm
Wendell,
I was expecting pictures of airplanes on a runway  . I think this is a "catwalk"  ...
Gerard
-

glamy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
- Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X
by curly on Sat May 27, 2006 8:02 pm
Wendell,
Great shots specially the last one. With this style of shooting what is "right"?
It's only "right" if you like it. As Chris said experiment to your hearts content and please keep sharing.
Regards
Curly
It's better to seek forgiveness afterwards than ask permission beforehand
-

curly
- Member
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:24 am
- Location: Valentine, Lake Macquarie
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|