
Mysterious CosmosModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Mysterious CosmosA very bright moon last night highlighted by clouds. A little bit of double imaging at the base of the moon - I don‘t know how or why. I like this shot, knowing that it is technically flawed, but would appreciate the views of other forum members.
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
I like it.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Chris - very different, but eye catching none the less. If I were to do anything to this image I'd crop a bit more off the bottom of the image. To me, there is a little too much black/dark at the bottom. Mind sharing with us how u took it? I.e exposure time primarily. It has a very surreal feel to it - the world spinning by. Thanks for sharing.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
I am with Geoff on this one.
would crop some from the bottom interesting shot. well done. steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Taken with the 70-200mm Sigma at 200mm with 2x Sigma, D2Hs f/8 for 3 seconds, iso 200.
Cropped version: ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Chris
Doesn't work for me, just a little too blurry. Guess that's why Leigh likes it (yes it's a cheap shot, but someone had to say it ![]() I do think the crop works better though FWIW Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks Peter - I believe that the reason I actually like this pic is that it represents a time line. Admittedly it’s only 3 seconds but it shows (like a racing car) that although we see objects as static they are in fact in motion constantly.
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
I love it. You can almost see it moving across the sky. Would make a good stock image.
Cheers Sheila Sheila Smart
Canon 5D and various Ls Black and White Spider Award 2005 - Photographer of the Year - amateur On-line Gallery here
Chris - the crop works nicely!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|