

and for the record, I prefer No.2.
Thanks.
Alex
Bin it or Keep it?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Bin it or Keep it?Two more from today's shoot. I really like these two photos, but the shadow on the face caused by the tree is too distracting, I think. I used SB800 with LSPJ II (with inverted dome) pointed straight up with flash comp. of -1.0. Obviously this was not enough for the fill effect on her face (position of the flash should have been different). I think next time I will use sb800 on a tripode as remote fill directed at the point were tree meets the face. Is it the way to avoid such a shadow? I will endevour to re-shoot this one in the future. However, do you think these two shots are rubbish or worth worth keeping?
![]() ![]() and for the record, I prefer No.2. Thanks. Alex
I dont mind the facial expression on both these.
I feel the strong backlighting doesnt help either of these though. A darker background may well work wonders for these steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Thanks, Michael. Gave this a quick go. It works except for the face texture has a change where I dodged. I might follow it by some cloning (skin grafting ![]() Alex
The tree and background are very distracting for me, especially the tree's shadow. I'm out of ideas as to how to improve or save the pic....
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Sorry mate bin 'em
There's too many things competing with each other here and the compostion just doesnt sit with me. Might have been better to get some more eye contact and reduce your flash some what. Hope you dont mind the comment but I'd rather be truthful ![]() I reckon:
2. Put the camera down and get a pencil and paper and picture in your mind some poses and some props you see her in, write them down 3. Review the list in a few days then enact the items you still feel good about cheers,
- Simon (Sydney, Australia)
Thank you for your comments, guys. Michael, I still think it looks bad - no offens intended. I will bin and re-shoot.
Cheers Alex
The B&W version is quite nice as an informal. To improve it significantly you should probably do as suggested and reshoot. This is a lovely girl but tell her to lose the corful eye makeup for your next shoot (please!).
regards
Mike Parker Frederick, MD Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints
Thanks, guys. I think I will reshot. I like this pose, but ideally I want background with no blown highlights and better fill flash on face. Cameraguy, I agree regarding the make up
![]() ![]()
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|