Flash flowers

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Flash flowers

Postby stubbsy on Tue May 02, 2006 11:57 pm

Did some experimenting in a friend's garden with some late afternoon flash photography. The idea was to separate the flower from the background using the onboard flash so you'd focus more strongly on the flower. All images with 24-120 VR. Too much or just right?

Image ... Image

Image

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed May 03, 2006 12:01 am

#3 (Flower #3) - This one works well brings out the flower nicely

#4 (Flower #2) - The best in my opinion, love the different in the pink and blue flowers

#2 and #1 Don't work for me, sorry.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby pharmer on Wed May 03, 2006 12:02 am

I like #2 Peter, looks surreal

I'm a big fan of vivid colours and all these exhibit that.

However, the obvious presence of bright flash detracts

Bounce it/diffuse it - just make it look natural :)

Cheers
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby sirhc55 on Wed May 03, 2006 12:19 am

Peter - I agree with Barrie on these photos. #3 holds more attention due to lack of flash hot spots. A diffuser would work well :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby stubbsy on Wed May 03, 2006 9:48 am

Thanks guys. Back to the drawing board. Next time I'll take my SB800
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby johnd on Wed May 03, 2006 10:19 am

Hi Peter, I think flower #1 and #2 work well. Maybe using your SB800 you could diffuse the light a bit to get rid of the flash reflections. Also with the SB800 you can get a whole lot more control of the amount of light on the flower and the background.

The other thing that I find works is to increase shadows when you convert from raw. I've done some like that and produced an almost completely black background. That makes the flower really stand out. Almost like being in a light box.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby avkomp on Wed May 03, 2006 10:58 am

Peter

The last is the only one that really works.
is separate from the background bu virtue of the darker background and red colour that hasnt been over flashed

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Hlop on Wed May 03, 2006 2:33 pm

Nice flowers, Peter! I just would like to see bit brighter white parts of the flower #3 BTW, I seems to be missed something while I was traveling .... You were going to switch to Canon 5D ... But in your profile I see D70 and "lusting D200"
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed May 03, 2006 2:50 pm

Peter
My thoughts....

Flower #4:
Really nice seperation from background, however I feel the angle chosen doesn't do justice to the flower (IMO).

Flower #1:
Great composition on this one. I find the OOF green leaf and orange background a touch distracting (could possibly be burned or cloned out).

Flower #3:
Very nice image. My preference would be to have it slightly off-centre, which might be a bit more visually pleasing (in my eyes anyway).

Flower #2:
The contrast in this one is really great. Again, I'd prefer to see it slightly off-centre.

My favourite would be Flower #1. Looking past the distractions, I feel it has the most interest whilst also showing good seperation from the background.....which I believe was the idea you were striving for.

This would certainly be a tough task using the onboard flash. With your SB800, this would be so much easier.....but perhaps less challenging !

If you do try it with the SB800, have a go putting the SB underneath or behind the flower (pointing in the direction of the camera). The translucent effects & weird shadows you can achieve make for interesting images.

Thanks for sharing.... :)
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby PALL on Wed May 03, 2006 3:38 pm

good one but flash light is too harsh,i will also suggest bounce flash or diffuse it more,although natural light will be best for such photography..
Pall.A.
PALL
Member
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:09 am
Location: SKT. , PAKISTAN.

Postby stubbsy on Wed May 03, 2006 10:27 pm

Thanks for the comments. Definitely SB-800 next visit.

Dave Thank you for the detailed analysis. I'll see if I can fix #1 a bit as suggested.

Mikhail - switch to Canon was a setup by the mods here as an April Fools Day joke (more details HERE)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Matt. K on Wed May 03, 2006 10:30 pm

Peter
#1,#2 and #3 are very strong images. Your eye continues to develop.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby kamran on Fri May 05, 2006 7:31 am

Lovely, rich colors. Very nice. All of them are good.

I wish my flower pics turned out half as good. :?
Nikon D200 | Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm DX | Sigma 15-30mm EX DG | Nikkor AF Micro 105mm 2.8 D | Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D | Nikon Speedlight SB-800
User avatar
kamran
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Postby wmaburnett on Fri May 05, 2006 9:00 am

very nice, 1,2,4 are my favorites, 2 doesnt have enough pop for me, but it well composed!
~William
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
wmaburnett
Member
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Minnesota, United States

Postby stubbsy on Fri May 05, 2006 10:04 am

Thanks for your comments gentlemen. I'm not normally known for my flower pics, so this was a gfood chance to stretch my style. I'll go back in spring and see what I can get with my SB800 and Lightsphere II
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby suzanneg on Fri May 05, 2006 11:24 pm

I really like 1,2 and 4. They do stand out from the background for me - almost a 3d affect. Pretty cool. 8)
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby bloop on Sat May 06, 2006 12:31 pm

Love the colour of #1, it's got a lot of 'pop'
User avatar
bloop
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:06 am
Location: Chipping Norton, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques