Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by daniel_r on Thu May 04, 2006 8:17 pm
After a bit of a delay, I've finally finished the PP on my images from the weekend.
A big thanks to Gary and Thanh for organising the meet, it was a good opportunity to catch up with people and meet some new faces.
I went for a bit of a walk around with Alpha_7 in some really pleasant afternoon light. Here's a couple of images for critique.
The rest of the set are here
Click for a larger version.
#1
#2
#3 (panning with the 18-70DX @ 18mm!)
#4
All comments welcome 
-

daniel_r
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
- Location: Canberra, ACT.
-
by pharmer on Thu May 04, 2006 8:39 pm
Good bold colours in #2 and #3.
#3 is best - nice feeling of movement and perspective
-
pharmer
- Member
-
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
- Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
by macka on Thu May 04, 2006 8:50 pm
Very cool panning effort
Well done.
Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
-

macka
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1092
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
- Location: North Rocks, Sydney
-
by losfp on Thu May 04, 2006 8:58 pm
#2 for me, then #3  It's interesting how fresh and new some familiar things can seem when seen from a different perspective.
-

losfp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney
-
by stubbsy on Thu May 04, 2006 9:00 pm
Daniel
Odd how we all perceive things. I like #3 the least since the blurry bottom really distracts me because it's neither sharp nor blurry enough to look like a panning shot. For me #1 is the best. I like the composition and the image tones.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by huynhie on Thu May 04, 2006 9:12 pm
Daniel,
The panning shot is good, but as Peter has said it would look better if you blurred it abit moore.
I like your second photo as well.
-

huynhie
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
- Location: Sydney
by Alpha_7 on Thu May 04, 2006 9:52 pm
Nice work Daniel,
#1 I really like the colour and the composition with this one works well
#2 Well worth looking a bit odd to take the shot, it came out better then I'd have imagined. The different perspective makes this shot, I wonder if a little fill flash may have brought out the tumbalong park a little more (then again, maybe it doesn't need it).
#3 The monorail came out sharp as (impressive) but to a point I agree that it could of been if the bottom was blurred more
#4 The flower bed right next to the tumbalong park (right?) Nice find, it is a little plain but thats more the flowers fault then yours
Thanks again for touring Darling Harbour with me, I enjoyed your company!
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by optogamut on Thu May 04, 2006 10:04 pm
Nice shots! Can't add anything new to the comments. I like #1 first, then #3.
- Danny
D70, CP700, F80, FM, F, 50/1.8, 28-105,....
"Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety." -Plato
-

optogamut
- Member
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:28 pm
- Location: Woodford, NSW
-
by wmaburnett on Fri May 05, 2006 10:41 am
i love the flower one, great depth of field!
~William
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
-
wmaburnett
- Member
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
- Location: Minnesota, United States
-
by daniel_r on Fri May 05, 2006 7:51 pm
Thanks for the feedback everyone!
I found the panning with the kit at 18mm is a bit harder than with a tele. I you pan for too long, it starts to perspective distort (bit of a wacky WA effect happing in the BG).
I didn't really expect the pan to really turn out at all, it was just a bit of mucking around while we were waiting for Stubbsy
The only other pan that turned out is this one. I think it's blurred across the whole frame instead and it doesn't appear to be as sharp as the first.
edit: I can't type.
-

daniel_r
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
- Location: Canberra, ACT.
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|