Portrait of grand daughter

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Portrait of grand daughter

Postby johnd on Tue May 02, 2006 9:33 pm

I had the honour of doing the photography at my daughter's wedding recently.
It was my first wedding as a photographer, and my daughter's as well. Talk about pressure.

This is a portrait of my grand daughter, Maya, taken at the wedding.
Good old kit lens.

ImageImage
Image


I think it works better in colour, but I'd appreciate comments please?
I've also toned down the red hue in the first image.

Other images featured in my gallery.

Cheers
John
Last edited by johnd on Tue May 02, 2006 10:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby TonyH on Tue May 02, 2006 9:37 pm

Hi John,

an excellent shot of your Grand-Daughter.

I do prefer the colour version. May I suggest toning the reds down a little?

Being the main photographer, I hope you still enjoyed ( and recall the event!)

Tony
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby birddog114 on Tue May 02, 2006 9:40 pm

John,
Colour version for me!
Great works.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby macka on Tue May 02, 2006 9:42 pm

John,

Hope you don't mind (if you do I'll take it down) - this is just a 30sec conversion I did, and it's not perfect by any menas, but I thought yours brought out a little of the red on her cheek too much, and was a bit dark and grey generally.

Image

Lovely image.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Geoff on Tue May 02, 2006 9:44 pm

Hi John,
I think the colour version works better too, it's a natural portrait, catching your grand daughter doing what she was, at that moment, in her own time. Nice one :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby johnd on Tue May 02, 2006 9:47 pm

Thanks for the comments Tony, Thanh and Macka.

Macka, the b/w conversion you did does look better. I'm afraid I'm a bit of a novice with b/w. I reckon I do less than 1% in b/w. Still, something new to learn. I guess if I want to do weddings, I'd better learn it quickly.

Tony, I'll go back and take another look at the nef, I might have overdone the reds when I converted it into PS.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Alex on Tue May 02, 2006 9:54 pm

John,

I'll be the odd one out - I prefer your B&W to the colour. Nice photo. Looking forward to seeing more from the wedding.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby rooboy on Tue May 02, 2006 9:55 pm

John, the colour version (and the subject of course :)) is gorgeous. The B&W you posted doesn't work for me because the skin tones are quite harsh, she has some blotches on her cheek. Unless she's a closet alcoholic I doubt that these are true to life. Macka's B&W is much softer & friendlier, more appropriate for this subject :)
So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby marcotrov on Tue May 02, 2006 10:08 pm

Gorgeous photo John, colour image here too :)
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby johnd on Tue May 02, 2006 10:15 pm

Thanks also for the comments Geoff, Alex, Patrick and Marco.

I'm sure the b/w can work, it might just be that I'm not skilled enough in that area.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Trieu on Wed May 03, 2006 11:01 am

Nice shot, 1st colour is my pick, then Macka's one.

Great Shot!
Cheers,
Trieu
30D and TWO L's
User avatar
Trieu
Member
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Sydney's West Canon 30D

Postby johnd on Wed May 03, 2006 12:40 pm

Thanks Trieu
Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Manta on Wed May 03, 2006 1:13 pm

Trieu wrote:Nice shot, 1st colour is my pick, then Macka's one.

Great Shot!


I agree with Trieu on this one John. The first one looks so much more natural to me.

I also hope you enjoyed the moment. I reckon I'll be an emotional wreck when my daughters' turns come around...
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby PALL on Wed May 03, 2006 3:55 pm

wow so cute,i liked all the versions.tha way pictures are displayed it also looks like a Photoshop color enhancement plugin addd" , lol.once again very good composition.

my one suggestion,a little shalow DOF can have made this a stunnig side portrate.only if the background was at some distance.
Pall.A.
PALL
Member
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:09 am
Location: SKT. , PAKISTAN.

Postby johnd on Thu May 04, 2006 10:42 am

Thanks Simon and Pall.

Yes Simon, I did enjoy the moment, but it was a bit stressful.

The original colour one was the print that my daughter liked and that went into the album.

Thanks to everyone for their comments. What I've learned from this is I need to learn how to do b/w better :)

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

One method

Postby Nikkofan on Thu May 04, 2006 3:57 pm

Hi John

I learned this method of B&W conversion from Matt K and I like it because it doesn't have the "flatness" that straight Desaturation or Greyscale conversion does:

In Photo Shop:
- Open Image
- Image - Mode - Lab Colour
- In the "Layers / Channels / Paths" palette, choose the Channels tab
- Delete the last 2 channels from the tab - you should be left with "Alpha 1" in the only channel left in the tab
- Do any other adjustments you want to do - sharpen, contrast, etc

When finished: go to Image - Mode - Grayscale
- File - Save As - save as a JPG, or whatever you want. If you don't go to Grayscale before you try to save, the only option you seem to get is to save it as a PSD. That's what I've found, using CS2, anyway.

You can also choose Multi Channels instead of Lab Channels. I've tried both, but find there doesn't seem to be any difference. All other instructions are otherwise the same.

This works a treat for me and I hope it might help you also. Good luck - btw, your granddaughter is a real cutie!

Lynn
Nikon D70, Nikon D200, Nikon F100, Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm, Nikon 17-55mm, Nikon 85mm, Nikon 24mm, Nikon 60mm, Nikon 105mm, Tamron 70-300, SB800, SB28, LSPJ
Nikkofan
Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 11:50 am
Location: Sydney's Beautiful South

Postby johnd on Thu May 04, 2006 6:56 pm

Thanks for that Lynn. Now you mention it I seem to remember a post from Matt K about this.
I've bookmarked this and will give it a go.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby robboh on Fri May 05, 2006 3:41 pm

Great Shot John!

Congrats on the wedding shoot! Did you need a good stiff drink afterwards?? I sure did!! Actually, I needed more than a few, the one I did recently. :lol:

I prefer the colour to the B&W. The first colour one just appears overly saturated generally to me (eg see the flower on her dress), pulling back the saturation should resolve a lot of your skin problem. The second colour pic looks like it has a green cast to me, but this monitor at work aint that great either.
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
User avatar
robboh
Member
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby johnd on Sun May 07, 2006 7:43 pm

Thanks Robboh. No such luck with the stiff drink. I had to drive my wife and parents about 100k after the wedding. Yeah, I agree the first is a bit over saturated. When I re-did it for the 2nd, I pulled a bit too much red out, giving a slight green cast. I'll go redo it in between.

One day I'll start on the b/w technique.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby mudder on Sun May 07, 2006 8:20 pm

Another interesting way to convert to B&W where you can "adjust" the hue's and toning of the result is a technique on the Russel Brown site...

- Add a hue/sat adjustment layer
- Add a second hue/sat adjustment layer and adjust the blend mode to color,
- Now, play with the hue of the first hue/sat adjustment layer and as you change the hue, it changes the tonings of the B&W...

You can even target specific color ranges affected by choosing any specific color either from the drop down list of the first hue/sat layer, or using the eye-dropper...

Seems spiffy, allows lots of control and doesn't modify the original data as you're only using adjustment layers...

Might be worth a play :)
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby johnd on Sun May 07, 2006 8:42 pm

Thanks Andrew.
Another technique to try :)

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques