



Flash flowersModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Flash flowersDid some experimenting in a friend's garden with some late afternoon flash photography. The idea was to separate the flower from the background using the onboard flash so you'd focus more strongly on the flower. All images with 24-120 VR. Too much or just right?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
#3 (Flower #3) - This one works well brings out the flower nicely
#4 (Flower #2) - The best in my opinion, love the different in the pink and blue flowers #2 and #1 Don't work for me, sorry.
Peter - I agree with Barrie on these photos. #3 holds more attention due to lack of flash hot spots. A diffuser would work well
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Thanks guys. Back to the drawing board. Next time I'll take my SB800
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Hi Peter, I think flower #1 and #2 work well. Maybe using your SB800 you could diffuse the light a bit to get rid of the flash reflections. Also with the SB800 you can get a whole lot more control of the amount of light on the flower and the background.
The other thing that I find works is to increase shadows when you convert from raw. I've done some like that and produced an almost completely black background. That makes the flower really stand out. Almost like being in a light box. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Peter
The last is the only one that really works. is separate from the background bu virtue of the darker background and red colour that hasnt been over flashed Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Nice flowers, Peter! I just would like to see bit brighter white parts of the flower #3 BTW, I seems to be missed something while I was traveling .... You were going to switch to Canon 5D ... But in your profile I see D70 and "lusting D200"
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
Peter
My thoughts.... Flower #4: Really nice seperation from background, however I feel the angle chosen doesn't do justice to the flower (IMO). Flower #1: Great composition on this one. I find the OOF green leaf and orange background a touch distracting (could possibly be burned or cloned out). Flower #3: Very nice image. My preference would be to have it slightly off-centre, which might be a bit more visually pleasing (in my eyes anyway). Flower #2: The contrast in this one is really great. Again, I'd prefer to see it slightly off-centre. My favourite would be Flower #1. Looking past the distractions, I feel it has the most interest whilst also showing good seperation from the background.....which I believe was the idea you were striving for. This would certainly be a tough task using the onboard flash. With your SB800, this would be so much easier.....but perhaps less challenging ! If you do try it with the SB800, have a go putting the SB underneath or behind the flower (pointing in the direction of the camera). The translucent effects & weird shadows you can achieve make for interesting images. Thanks for sharing.... ![]() Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Thanks for the comments. Definitely SB-800 next visit.
Dave Thank you for the detailed analysis. I'll see if I can fix #1 a bit as suggested. Mikhail - switch to Canon was a setup by the mods here as an April Fools Day joke (more details HERE) Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Lovely, rich colors. Very nice. All of them are good.
I wish my flower pics turned out half as good. ![]() Nikon D200 | Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm DX | Sigma 15-30mm EX DG | Nikkor AF Micro 105mm 2.8 D | Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D | Nikon Speedlight SB-800
very nice, 1,2,4 are my favorites, 2 doesnt have enough pop for me, but it well composed!
~William Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
Thanks for your comments gentlemen. I'm not normally known for my flower pics, so this was a gfood chance to stretch my style. I'll go back in spring and see what I can get with my SB800 and Lightsphere II
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|