Any feedback on PP (Photoshop Playing)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Any feedback on PP (Photoshop Playing)

Postby BullcreekBob on Sun Apr 30, 2006 8:37 pm

G'day

I used to have the view that anything done within Photoshop was cheating, or diminishing my skill as a *photographer*, however now I'm tring to learn that a photo is only one form of an image and there are many other image types, all with their own skill sets and *eye*.

So as a series of projects I'm trying to get a better grasp of of some of the things that can be done within photoshop. This is the first modified image that I've not deleted. I like that it is possible to recognise the underlying photo but the image has been moved sufficiently far from it's origins to be something else altogether different albeit related.

Image

Perhaps I should have just deleted it? Obviously by posting here, I'm looking for critiques but I'd be pleased to hear someone say something positive. (Or who wants to buy a slightly used Photshop CS2?)

Cheers
Bob in Bull Creek
User avatar
BullcreekBob
Member
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Manning - an inner southern suburb of Perth, WA

Postby NikonUser on Sun Apr 30, 2006 8:50 pm

Looks great to me as artwork.

It'd be interesting to see how that would print on a canvas type material.

Paul
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**

Postby the foto fanatic on Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:27 pm

Whilst it's not my cup of tea aesthetically, I certainly wouldn't discourage you from imagining, exploring and inventing.

I think this image would benefit from the removal of the brown "shadow" in the background. I'd be tempted to clone it to the blue colour, thus throwing the focus onto the grevillea and the bird.

I agree that the image might benefit from being transferred to a textured surface like canvas. I hope this isn't insulting, but it reminds me of one of those DIY tapestry that you can buy to sew over. Perhaps there is a market there!

And photography isn't confined to any one genre. Follow where your art takes you, and see what happens. Bradman didn't score a century every time he went out to bat, and I'm sure that not every Cartier-Bresson image was acclaimed.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby BullcreekBob on Mon May 01, 2006 12:05 pm

cricketfan wrote:I think this image would benefit from the removal of the brown "shadow" in the background.


It just shows how different we all are !!. I like the brown shadowing and the way it sort of fades out the Grevillia.

Cheers
Bob in Bull Creek
User avatar
BullcreekBob
Member
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Manning - an inner southern suburb of Perth, WA

Postby stubbsy on Mon May 01, 2006 1:01 pm

BullcreekBob wrote:
cricketfan wrote:I think this image would benefit from the removal of the brown "shadow" in the background.


It just shows how different we all are !!. I like the brown shadowing and the way it sort of fades out the Grevillia.

Cheers
Bob in Bull Creek

Sure does Bob, and that's the great thing about any art form. I'm with Trevor though - the brown blob detracts from the image for me. I encourage you to continue your experiments.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby wmaburnett on Mon May 01, 2006 3:20 pm

hmm this is interesting, i like it, i cant really put my fingure on why is like it but i do
~William
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
wmaburnett
Member
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Minnesota, United States

Yup, I think you're right

Postby BullcreekBob on Mon May 01, 2006 3:25 pm

Hi guys,

This is a super-rough recut with more of the shitty brown stuff removed, I didn't think so beforehand but it would seem your suggestions (as always !!) are pretty spot on.

Image

Thanks for your help.

Cheers
Bob BTW, the un pp'ed version looks like
Image

Maybe I should have left it alone?
User avatar
BullcreekBob
Member
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Manning - an inner southern suburb of Perth, WA

Postby marcotrov on Mon May 01, 2006 3:28 pm

Commendable effort Bob. It's very artistic in feel and as you say considerably removed from the original in feel. Well done.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby TonyH on Mon May 01, 2006 3:42 pm

I reckon also this one would be nice on canvas and perhaps a roughly applied varnish to give the impression of being painted....?

What do you think?


Tony
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby stubbsy on Mon May 01, 2006 7:28 pm

Yep - the rework is much better (but then I'd have to say that :wink: )
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby christiand on Mon May 01, 2006 8:27 pm

Hi Bob,

I think you made great efforts with PP to enhance the photo.
I also think that the "un-PP'ed" photo shows that there are limitations
with what can be done doing PP.
I't would appear to me that the "un-PP'ed" photo shows lots of softness
(focussing problem ?) to a degree that connot be fixed with sharpening.

HTH,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques