Help with this photo

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Help with this photo

Postby suzanneg on Sun Apr 23, 2006 12:30 am

These are two shots taken at the Sydney Uni quad. I was wandering around while Macka and Rooboy were shooting the handball.

Are either of these shots worth fixing? Next time I will try bracketing. Haven't done that yet.

Would you start with the underexposed one or the other. Suggestions please.

Image

Image
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Sun Apr 23, 2006 12:35 am

First shot would be worthwhile to change to b&w. If you're using p/shop, select the darker areas with the lasso and adjust the levels to bring the up a bit. By doing so, you will bring up some noise but with b&w conversion it should give it a bit more character.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Geoff on Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:38 am

I would personally start with the under exposed one. For next time I think some fill flash would have helped you out loads in this shot. A good suggestion by Pirostitch to convert to B&W - the first one is definately salvagable, look forward to seeing your efforts. :D
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby rooboy on Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:48 am

Have a play with Shadows/Highlight command (Image => Adjustments => Shadow/Highlight). The top slider will bring up the shadows (& noise), the highlights slider will pull the bright areas down (& often introduces a colour cast). It won't help with the blown out footpath though.
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby big pix on Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:54 am

have a look here ...........

http://www.russellbrown.com/tips_tech.html
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby suzanneg on Sun Apr 23, 2006 6:49 pm

I've had a go. Comments?

Image
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby big pix on Sun Apr 23, 2006 6:54 pm

better tonal range, but I would also like to see it in colour......... I also have a small book under the right hand side of my computer......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Glen on Sun Apr 23, 2006 7:19 pm

Suzanne, I like the last version. :D I also have slipped a couple of business cards under the right hand side of my computer :wink:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby suzanneg on Sun Apr 23, 2006 7:42 pm

:lol: Well, the whole thing is not very straight. Both edges actually lean in, but I can take a hint.
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:41 am

IMHO, much better than the first version :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby gstark on Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:48 am

Suzanne,

Other have suggested starting with the underexposed mage. Without having the larger sized images to go on, I'm going to suggest starting with the overexposed one, simply because you'll probably have more data in the image with which you can play.

I'd also be a tad concerned about noise issues in the underexposed sections of the image, and if your starting with an underexposed image in the first instance, this may already be an issue just waiting to rear its ugly head.

Don't worry too much about the "lean"; what you're seeing is natural distortion due to the fact that camera would have been pointed up slightly to make these images: look at applying a little perspective control in your PP if this concerns you.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques