First Try at Lightning

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

First Try at Lightning

Postby wmaburnett on Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:06 pm

Here is my first non scenic try at lightning here in early spring north america with rain spitting at me, i was usuing my 18-70mm lens,

Image

Image

Any comments, suggestion or anythign would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
~William
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
wmaburnett
Member
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Minnesota, United States

Postby stubbsy on Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:47 pm

William

The second image works better for me since there's no land at the bottom so we have just the tree & the sky, but regardless these are both great captures and would look great nice & big.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby avkomp on Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:09 pm

the first one doesnt do anything for me
but
just love the second. well done.

steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby greencardigan on Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:27 pm

Very nice. Must have been quite spectacular to watch.

The second one without the ground looks better to me.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby Laurie on Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:19 pm

i love lightning shots, and i looks to me that you captured them quiet well. its always difficult when there is water and a camera.
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby MattC on Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:19 pm

Both are well captured. I have no objection to having the ground in the shot.

I would however back the exposure off a little. The tree would be primarily lit by artificial light sources and WB on the foreground does not appear right. Darkening the exposure will not hurt the capture of the lightning, but will darken the foreground some - and those artificial light sources will have less impact. I also find that the exposure of the foreground is distracting me from the real subject - the lightning.

Cheers
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby elffinarts on Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:40 pm

while I see Matt's comment on the conflicting white balance issue with the somewhat orange tree being technically correct, I actually dont mind the shot as it is. It makes me think of autumn colours - though, is that tree an evergreen? lol

I have no aversions to seeing land in a lightning shot (providing it has a straight horizon and doesnt detract from the lightning with too much detail) and sometimes the land can be used to frame the shape of lightning strikes to good effect. In the case of the second shot I think it worked well with the overall composition.
Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com
D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
User avatar
elffinarts
Member
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Albion, Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques