Behold the power of the 70-300G!! Footy pics

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Behold the power of the 70-300G!! Footy pics

Postby losfp on Sun Apr 09, 2006 11:32 pm

Well, I'm a sucker for punishment. I've been using the oft-discussed Nikkor 70-300G for the last couple of days on the weekend.. Yesterday at the zoo (more pics later, when I could be bothered PPing), and today at the footy. These were all taken from ground level (front row, on the fence) during the reserves game at the Sydney v Port Adelaide match.. I believe it is the Swans reserves vs Queanbeyan.

Didn't bother taking pics during the main game, good thing too, I might have sent a D70s-shaped missile in the general direction of the players, they were that inept.

Anyhoo. These are some of the better ones, out of a pretty horrible bunch. Mostly 1/1000 or 1/800, f/8, ISO400. The rule of thumb is that the better the composition /shot, the more likely you are to focus on the seating behind the players.

I found I could get "okay" results by doing a bit of cropping/resizing/USM PP on the few specimens that were vaguely in focus. A bit noisy due to the ISO and PP, but what can ya do?

Would love to hear from experienced sports shooters, and any suggestions.

ps: "Get a 70-200VR" is not a helpful suggestion. I'm working on it, ok??? :D

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby Willy wombat on Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am

behold the power!

It looks like you were a long way from the action. Close crops?

Can you post a resized full frame shot for us to compare please?
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby losfp on Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:47 am

Will do so, later tonight. They are reasonably tight crops from centre of frame, the most extreme is #2, which is almost a 100% crop. The others are more of a 200% crop. Or should that be 50% crop. Can't work it out :)
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby Manta on Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:02 am

Couple of questions - why not shoot at ISO 200? It looks like there was plenty of available light so fast shutter speeds should have been easily achievable at the lowest ISO.

Were you using autofocus? If so, were you using AF-S or AF-C? AF-C would have allowed you to follow and keep in focus a specific subject regardless of its movement, provided you keep the chosen focus bracket over the subject. (Any of the focus brackets will do this but the centre one has a slightly wider range and so is the best one to use).
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby losfp on Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:16 am

Some answers for you both :)

My normal seats at the SCG are up high, but for the photos I posted, I sat right on the fence for about 15 mins. For most of that time, a lot of the action was on the other side of the ground though - one thing I've learnt is that players will tend to face inward towards the centre of the ground, so your best chance of getting a shot of the front of a player is from the opposite side of the ground! Otherwise, park yourself behind the goals/tryline as that is where they will run. For these shots, I was on the wing.

Manta, I was shooting at f/8 because the 70-300G is unacceptably soft wide open at 300mm. It's marginally better at f/8 :) Combined with the shutter speed I wanted to shoot at (didn't have a monopod) meant that I had to bump the ISO up to 400. The sun was almost directly overhead too, so I had to deal with shadows as well.

I used AF-S because I've not had a lot of luck with AF-C mode in the past with the 70-300G. I think it just can't keep up......
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby Manta on Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:16 am

Good points Losfp. I understand the settings you've used now and, given the problems you had, you did well to get these shots at all. I, too, find the 70-300G way too slow focussing but can't really afford to upgrade yet. :cry:
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques