#1

#2

#3

Thanks!
Which shot is stronger ?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
31 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Which shot is stronger ?I had a little outing with the camera and the 80-200 2.8 at lunch as I wasn't feeling hungry. Here are 3 shots taken from the same spot but framed very differently and I'm interested as to which one you feel is a stronger photo, or if you think they are all rubbish, do say so.
#1 ![]() #2 ![]() #3 ![]() Thanks!
3rd one
composition is more challenging the tight crop also invites the viewer inand the abstractness of it allows for deeper contemplation on the image
agree with Wendell (see, I MUST be arty!!!)
![]() The background in the other two is too distracting. In the third, it is clear what the subject is, but there is still enough of the background to put it in context, and create interest. *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Sorry guys, I disagree.
2nd one for sure - the 3 layers of depth I find much more interesting (ie: foreground in focus, then ship is 2nd layer, Bridge is 3rd layer.) Tells much more of a story to me, hence more interesting. Nikon D70, Nikon D200, Nikon F100, Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm, Nikon 17-55mm, Nikon 85mm, Nikon 24mm, Nikon 60mm, Nikon 105mm, Tamron 70-300, SB800, SB28, LSPJ
#3. The curve of the cropped lifesaver almost mimics the curve of the coat hanger in the background, which creates more of an appeal for me.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
#3 as well. The focus is clean and the subject is clearly identifiable. the background adds interest without overpowering the subject. It's the pick here.
#2 - too centre orientated, but the focus is spot on, as is the DOF plane. #1 - I've been trying to figure out where the actual focus was set in this image - I've found this happens occasionally with the D70 in some of my shots too.
#3 because it adds the texture of the rope to the image. However, I feel the lifesaver could have done with a tiny bit more exposure. Fill flash maybe.
Craig Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
I agree with the majority, #3 is the pick of the bunch.
It would be interesting to have seen all three images displayed with the same image size, sometimes a larger image (like #3) can be more eye catching just because it is larger. 'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
I like the first because of the strong focus on the life-saver thing with the hint of the location in the background, but prefer the third for the strongest, most appealing composition, well for me anyway...
Aka Andrew
#3 best by far.
#2 red boat is to distracting, you find your eyes can't just be drawn in without darting around. #1 is a happy snap. Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
#1 and #3 equally. I think they are both better than #2. There is too much other detail in #2.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
#3 for me too Craig the sharpness of the partially disclosed but obvious life buoy complements and balances the much harder to define but intriguing elements in the background. Well done.
cheers marco
Gosh I just like #3.
Steve
------------------------------------------------------- So many things to do - so little time.
Number 3 for me aswell.. then number 1... too much clutter for my liking in 2.. ur eye is drawn to the ship in the background
Tim D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent
My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
Thanks everyone for the feedback, I was actually expecting a lot of people not to like them, so I'm surprised by some of the feedback.
I failed to mention when I posted the shots, they are straight from camera as I didn't have access to CS2. For me I prefer #3 as the shapes mirror each other and the OOF boat blends well with the lifesaving ring.
Another vote for No3, I liked it so much, It just inspires me to look at things differently when composing different shots
![]() ![]() More fishing, more sport, more photo's Pentax 1stds
Thanks TerminalTackle.
In the afternoon light I revisted the same ring and fired off two quick shots before the light faded. One with fill flash and one without, its interesting to see the difference the light makes to pretty much the same shot just a few hours apart. ![]() The second I tried some fill flash. ![]()
Definatly the first without the fill light. for me this time
Brett ![]() ![]() More fishing, more sport, more photo's Pentax 1stds
Hi Craig,
the one here without the flash. The end of the day makes for some very nice shadows, adds depth to the photo, well done, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Craig,
Definately the 1st one of the 2nd series. Looks like the fill flash was a bit too strong. Also I think the framing is better in the 1st pic of the 2nd series vs the 3rd picture of the 1st series ![]()
This is the version Doug prefers, its the 1st shot of the second batch, but cropped to be more rule of thirdsy. ![]() Thanks again for all the feedback.
Craig, I deliberately didn't look at what others were saying before I made my pick.
3 (just in case you weren't convinced ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
all 3 do very little for me......... the shot has very little substance.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
#3 for me as well, I do still find the boat a little distracting, I think it would be a better shot with just the lifesaver and the bridge background
Cheers Rod
Previous topic • Next topic
31 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|