Which shot is stronger ?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Which shot is stronger ?

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:21 pm

I had a little outing with the camera and the 80-200 2.8 at lunch as I wasn't feeling hungry. Here are 3 shots taken from the same spot but framed very differently and I'm interested as to which one you feel is a stronger photo, or if you think they are all rubbish, do say so.

#1
Image

#2
Image

#3
Image

Thanks!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby wendellt on Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:24 pm

3rd one
composition is more challenging the tight crop also invites the viewer inand the abstractness of it allows for deeper contemplation on the image
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby sheepie on Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:40 pm

agree with Wendell (see, I MUST be arty!!!) :shock:

The background in the other two is too distracting. In the third, it is clear what the subject is, but there is still enough of the background to put it in context, and create interest.
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby Nikkofan on Tue Apr 04, 2006 4:18 pm

Sorry guys, I disagree.

2nd one for sure - the 3 layers of depth I find much more interesting (ie: foreground in focus, then ship is 2nd layer, Bridge is 3rd layer.) Tells much more of a story to me, hence more interesting.
Nikon D70, Nikon D200, Nikon F100, Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm, Nikon 17-55mm, Nikon 85mm, Nikon 24mm, Nikon 60mm, Nikon 105mm, Tamron 70-300, SB800, SB28, LSPJ
Nikkofan
Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 11:50 am
Location: Sydney's Beautiful South

Postby pharmer on Tue Apr 04, 2006 4:21 pm

#3 all the way

Sometimes it is better to crop the main object in the compostion to create an abstract idea. The mind has to think about the image

The other two images are not compelling at all.
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby PiroStitch on Tue Apr 04, 2006 4:40 pm

#3. The curve of the cropped lifesaver almost mimics the curve of the coat hanger in the background, which creates more of an appeal for me.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Mal on Tue Apr 04, 2006 4:43 pm

mmmmm doughnuts! I think that you must have subconsciously been thinking about food here.
And number three all the way for me.
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby whiz on Tue Apr 04, 2006 4:55 pm

Yep. Definately #3!
People put way too much rubbish in signature blocks.


Image
whiz
Member
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:28 pm
Location: Richardson, Canberra

Postby daniel_r on Tue Apr 04, 2006 4:59 pm

#3 as well. The focus is clean and the subject is clearly identifiable. the background adds interest without overpowering the subject. It's the pick here.

#2 - too centre orientated, but the focus is spot on, as is the DOF plane.

#1 - I've been trying to figure out where the actual focus was set in this image - I've found this happens occasionally with the D70 in some of my shots too.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby CraigVTR on Tue Apr 04, 2006 5:42 pm

#3 because it adds the texture of the rope to the image. However, I feel the lifesaver could have done with a tiny bit more exposure. Fill flash maybe.

Craig
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride."
D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
User avatar
CraigVTR
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland

Postby smac on Tue Apr 04, 2006 6:45 pm

I agree with the majority, #3 is the pick of the bunch.

It would be interesting to have seen all three images displayed with the same image size, sometimes a larger image (like #3) can be more eye catching just because it is larger.
'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
User avatar
smac
Member
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby mudder on Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:42 pm

I like the first because of the strong focus on the life-saver thing with the hint of the location in the background, but prefer the third for the strongest, most appealing composition, well for me anyway...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Matt. K on Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:42 pm

#3 because it has a repeating shape that unifies the composition.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby obzelite on Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:46 pm

#3 best by far.

#2 red boat is to distracting, you find your eyes can't just be drawn in without darting around.

#1 is a happy snap.
Simon
www.colberne.com.au
I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
User avatar
obzelite
Senior Member
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:47 am
Location: Willagee, WA - D90

Postby Killakoala on Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:46 pm

#1 and #3 equally. I think they are both better than #2. There is too much other detail in #2.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby marcotrov on Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:48 pm

#3 for me too Craig the sharpness of the partially disclosed but obvious life buoy complements and balances the much harder to define but intriguing elements in the background. Well done.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby SteveGriffin on Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:49 pm

Gosh I just like #3.
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby Zeeke on Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:57 pm

Number 3 for me aswell.. then number 1... too much clutter for my liking in 2.. ur eye is drawn to the ship in the background


Tim
D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent

My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net
My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
User avatar
Zeeke
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1318
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:38 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast, Qld, AU

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:59 pm

Thanks everyone for the feedback, I was actually expecting a lot of people not to like them, so I'm surprised by some of the feedback.

I failed to mention when I posted the shots, they are straight from camera as I didn't have access to CS2.

For me I prefer #3 as the shapes mirror each other and the OOF boat blends well with the lifesaving ring.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby terminaltackle on Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:11 pm

Another vote for No3, I liked it so much, It just inspires me to look at things differently when composing different shots :shock: :shock:
More fishing, more sport, more photo's Pentax 1stds
User avatar
terminaltackle
Member
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: Alexandra Hills Qld

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:15 pm

Thanks TerminalTackle.

In the afternoon light I revisted the same ring and fired off two quick shots before the light faded. One with fill flash and one without, its interesting to see the difference the light makes to pretty much the same shot just a few hours apart.

Image

The second I tried some fill flash.

Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby terminaltackle on Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:53 pm

Definatly the first without the fill light. for me this time
Brett :wink: :wink:
More fishing, more sport, more photo's Pentax 1stds
User avatar
terminaltackle
Member
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: Alexandra Hills Qld

Postby radar on Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:57 pm

Hi Craig,

the one here without the flash. The end of the day makes for some very nice shadows, adds depth to the photo,

well done,

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Postby Potatis on Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:59 pm

The one I like most is the one you haven't posted yet. Post it. :)
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby ozczecho on Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:59 pm

Craig,

Definately the 1st one of the 2nd series. Looks like the fill flash was a bit too strong. Also I think the framing is better in the 1st pic of the 2nd series vs the 3rd picture of the 1st series :shock: hope that made sense.
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:02 pm

Potatis wrote:The one I like most is the one you haven't posted yet. Post it. :)


This is the version Doug prefers, its the 1st shot of the second batch, but cropped to be more rule of thirdsy.

Image

Thanks again for all the feedback.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Alex on Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:03 pm

Craig, definately the one without flash or 3rd one in the first series.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Slider on Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:03 am

Craig, I deliberately didn't look at what others were saying before I made my pick.

3 (just in case you weren't convinced :lol: )
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby big pix on Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:08 am

all 3 do very little for me......... the shot has very little substance.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby byrt_001 on Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:49 am

hi

i think the first one without the fill flash, more of the ropes, is good.
the last one, with the crop, looses too much.

thanks for sharing

christian
User avatar
byrt_001
Member
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:54 pm
Location: beatifuloutback,carnarvon. wa

Postby Sandy Feet on Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:57 am

#3 for me as well, I do still find the boat a little distracting, I think it would be a better shot with just the lifesaver and the bridge background

Cheers
Rod
User avatar
Sandy Feet
Member
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Cooroibah, Sunshine Coast, QLD


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques