Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by losfp on Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:01 am
I've never really done self portraits before, at least ones that are not of the "hold small p&s at arm's length, produce cheesy grin and snap away" variety.
Given that this month's ES is self portraits, I thought it might not be a bad time to start trying. I actually found it a lot harder than I expected it to be. For those who have posted some excellent SPs in the time I have been visiting, I tips me lid to you. A lot of my shots were wasted on getting myself in the frame correctly, and it IS harder to judge exposure etc when you're not behind the viewfinder.
A couple of ideas that I played with in the last 2 days:
1) I think this one turned out the best, even though it is a bit short on originality. The only light source is my SB800 at about 2 o'clock, with LSPJ. 50/1.8, 1/30 @ f/8. ISO500
2) Tried something a bit different. Light from the TV on my right, SB800 with LSPJ on the other side, about 5 metres away, otherwise completely dark. 70-210 @ 70mm, 1/3 @ f/8. ISO800
3) Having a chat to one of our fuzzy friends (not sure if this qualifies as a self portrait if I'm not the only subject!!). 50/1.8, 1/30 @ f/8. ISO500. SB800 w/ LSPJ at about 1 o'clock.
4) This one was an accident, but I thought it came out pretty cool.... Didn't expect it to have a shutter speed quite as slow, so it's all blurred to hell. 70-210 @ 70mm, 1/3 @ f/4. ISO1600. Same lighting as #2
Comments, suggestions welcome! I'd love to hear from the self-portrait gurus  Might improve when I get used to looking at my own face staring out at me at 100% on my screen...

-

losfp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney
-
by Glen on Mon Apr 03, 2006 7:51 am
I prefer the second, the third has a nice sense of humour about it but doesn't engage with the viewer
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by huynhie on Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:12 am
The second one for me too.
-

huynhie
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
- Location: Sydney
by stubbsy on Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:03 am
Des - #2 (although oddly it doesn't look like you to me). Make sure you put one in the ES thread too.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by losfp on Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:08 am
Thanks for the feedback guys
Glen, the pic with the froggie was my way of getting a bit of comic relief after 15 minutes of "serious" poses. I'm not naturally serious, so it was needed!
Peter, I'll definitely submit one to the ES this week.. This is my sneaky way of gauging response for which was the "best" to submit 
-

losfp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney
-
by ozimax on Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:23 pm
I'm definitely no portrait guru, but I do like the 1st one with it's overpowering shadow effect.
In the second, there are a three glints in each eye which I find distracting. They are easily cloned out. All in all a nice effort. Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-

ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
by Mj on Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:31 pm
Well I actually prefer the forth... it holds more interest for me as the pose is less portrait typical and your expression has me wondering a little what you might have been up to... maybe you've been caught with hands in the cookie jar?
-

Mj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
- Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}
by sirhc55 on Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:14 pm
I prefer the last shot simply because it does not look posed - and it’s in colour 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Killakoala on Mon Apr 03, 2006 7:01 pm
I think the last one is my pick of the bunch. The extra light flare adds something else to the image.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by Matt. K on Mon Apr 03, 2006 7:07 pm
Des
I like the last one. It's as if you are watching a film strip.
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by spada on Mon Apr 03, 2006 7:11 pm
Hi
I like the last one with your eye stairing at the camera, lơk like you are in a big supprise.
regards
spada
-
spada
- Member
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Riverwood Sydney Age old Fuji S2
by suzanneg on Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:17 pm
It's the last one for me as well. This photo really made me laugh. It is the classic comedic expression when you are staring into the camera like you're trying to see something. If it was film, the next scene would be that something would squirt you in the eye.
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
-

suzanneg
- Member
-
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
- Location: Epping, Sydney
-
by Dug on Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:45 pm
#1 is #1
I like #3 too but I am a frog person 
-

Dug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1082
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:58 pm
- Location: maroochydore Q
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|