Working out the 70 - 200 VR

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Working out the 70 - 200 VR

Postby shakey on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:07 pm

A couple of weekends ago I tried the lens out in a low light concert. My latest attempt was in very bright light. Still wanted to use this at 2.8 to reduce DOF. This is one of the local kids doing some showjumping.

Image

A lot the shots came out fuzzy so I'm still playing with this thing.
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby Raskill on Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:10 pm

Nice image, great capture, you've got the riders face looking nice and intense.

I'd say though looking at the image that there was enought light not to use the lens wide open, you could have used it a few stops higher, and still got the shutter speeds you need as well as getting a better DOF.

It's hard to buy the 70-200VR then get used to not using it at F2.8, but on plenty bright days there is not always a need to.

You could also try using a fill flash to bring out detail on the horse, but that restrict s your shutter speed to 1/500, so depending on the speed of the subject, it's not always a bonus.

I like the image though, well done!
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:31 pm

Lovely image - well caught with beautiful colour.

Regarding fill flash - this would be, IMO, a no-no. If you spooked the horse (no blinkers) the rider could come a cropper :roll:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby marcotrov on Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:43 pm

Terrific action image Shakey. Colours great it's sharp and on the peak of the action
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Geoff on Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:24 pm

Gotta love that lens - great shot!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby nito on Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:12 pm

very nice shot. I like the direction of the eyes for both the rider and horse.
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby losfp on Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:19 pm

Great capture!

That lens is a beauty for sure... Want want want want want...
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby thaddeus on Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:14 pm

I really dislike this shot because I took one look at it and knew I was about to be $2,300 poorer. Birdy, you have mail!
User avatar
thaddeus
Member
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Geoff on Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:20 pm

thaddeus wrote:I really dislike this shot because I took one look at it and knew I was about to be $2,300 poorer. Birdy, you have mail!



:D :D :D :D :D

You're gonna LOVE it! :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby shakey on Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:45 pm

Thanks for all the great comments.

Raskill..I did take shots at other apertures, but the reason for shooting at 2.8 was to see if a narrow DOF would make the subject "pop" from the background. I think it does. I don't use flash on showjumpers. If a horse knocked down a jump I'd be throttled by the parents and the rider. :) :) :) :)
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby shakey on Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:57 pm

thaddeus wrote:I really dislike this shot because I took one look at it and knew I was about to be $2,300 poorer. Birdy, you have mail!


If you need to be dissuaded I could post some of the crappy shots. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

No its a seriously good piece of glass. This one was with the VR turned off. I'd read somewhere that the VR can lead to a little shutter lag...which is not a good thing for showjumping.., but I thought that even "Shakey" could hand hold at 1/5000 or whatever at 70 mm
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby thaddeus on Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:09 pm

My lens arrived and I've been taking oodles of crappy shots too! Thanks for the prompt to buy the lens!
User avatar
thaddeus
Member
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby SteveGriffin on Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:09 pm

My lens arrived and I've been taking oodles of crappy shots too! Thanks for the prompt to buy the lens!


The beauty of it is that the percentage of crappy shots is lower :roll:
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby glamy on Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:37 pm

I am glad I am not the only one taking crappy shots with this lens. When they are good they are very good, but I think we may be too complacent and the VR is not a panacea.
Shakey,
That is a very good shot...
Cheers,
Gerard
User avatar
glamy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques