
A lot the shots came out fuzzy so I'm still playing with this thing.
Working out the 70 - 200 VRModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Working out the 70 - 200 VRA couple of weekends ago I tried the lens out in a low light concert. My latest attempt was in very bright light. Still wanted to use this at 2.8 to reduce DOF. This is one of the local kids doing some showjumping.
![]() A lot the shots came out fuzzy so I'm still playing with this thing.
Nice image, great capture, you've got the riders face looking nice and intense.
I'd say though looking at the image that there was enought light not to use the lens wide open, you could have used it a few stops higher, and still got the shutter speeds you need as well as getting a better DOF. It's hard to buy the 70-200VR then get used to not using it at F2.8, but on plenty bright days there is not always a need to. You could also try using a fill flash to bring out detail on the horse, but that restrict s your shutter speed to 1/500, so depending on the speed of the subject, it's not always a bonus. I like the image though, well done! 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
Lovely image - well caught with beautiful colour.
Regarding fill flash - this would be, IMO, a no-no. If you spooked the horse (no blinkers) the rider could come a cropper ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Gotta love that lens - great shot!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() You're gonna LOVE it! ![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Thanks for all the great comments.
Raskill..I did take shots at other apertures, but the reason for shooting at 2.8 was to see if a narrow DOF would make the subject "pop" from the background. I think it does. I don't use flash on showjumpers. If a horse knocked down a jump I'd be throttled by the parents and the rider. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
If you need to be dissuaded I could post some of the crappy shots. ![]() ![]() ![]() No its a seriously good piece of glass. This one was with the VR turned off. I'd read somewhere that the VR can lead to a little shutter lag...which is not a good thing for showjumping.., but I thought that even "Shakey" could hand hold at 1/5000 or whatever at 70 mm
The beauty of it is that the percentage of crappy shots is lower ![]() Steve
------------------------------------------------------- So many things to do - so little time.
I am glad I am not the only one taking crappy shots with this lens. When they are good they are very good, but I think we may be too complacent and the VR is not a panacea.
Shakey, That is a very good shot... Cheers, Gerard
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|