Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Mitchell on Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:54 am
Inspired by my relatively new purchase of a DSLR and newly developed basic knowledge of photoshop, I decided to scan in some photos I took in Antarctica a couple of years ago.
At that stage I was unenlightened and only carrying a point and shoot, but even that got stolen in Peru the week before we sailed… Fortunately I borrowed an old P&S from one of the passengers.
I scanned in the 35mm negatives (CanonScan LiDE 500F) at 2400dpi, then for pp I generally used spot healing, noise reduction filter (mainly colour), vignette correction, curves for cast and contrast, then sharpening.
I often found there was a lot of noise after scanning (similar to when I use a high ISO on my 350D) Is that the film, or am I doing something wrong with the scanner? I have mostly taken the noise out of the sky with a gaussian blur.
C&c please! Thanks.
#1
#2
#3
#4
-

Mitchell
- Member
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
- Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris
-
by big pix on Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:57 am
What a great place to visit........ good capture
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by wendellt on Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:47 am
all amazing but 1 and 3 are just spectacular, lighting angle comp everything
lot soof people think antartica is boring jus tice and stuff but it has so much varied beauty, it's on my travel list
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Marvin on Mon Feb 27, 2006 12:00 pm
Wow! Stunning scenery. Number 1 is my favourite. I would love to visit!
Nikon D7000
-

Marvin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.
by Alpha_7 on Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:28 pm
Simply beautiful, just shows it's not the tools and toys but the eye and brain behind the camera. Lovely images things that most of us may never see for ourselves! Thanks for sharing.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by Hlop on Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:37 pm
Mitchell wrote:I often found there was a lot of noise after scanning (similar to when I use a high ISO on my 350D) Is that the film, or am I doing something wrong with the scanner? I have mostly taken the noise out of the sky with a gaussian blur.
Nice set of photos, Mitchell
Accordingly to noise problem ... if you're doing sharpening while scanning film it's pulling grain and making it more visible. When I'm scanning films I'm switching off all possible features, except for DigitalICE sometimes. And if i want to make grains more visible I'm switching sharpening on
Last edited by Hlop on Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-

Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by MHD on Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:16 pm
Green with Envy...
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by obzelite on Mon Feb 27, 2006 3:14 pm
Very nice photos.
Great colour saturation in no 4 as well. that would look great blown up.
On my list as one place i have to visit.
What film did you use to take them?
Simon
www.colberne.com.au
I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
-

obzelite
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:47 am
- Location: Willagee, WA - D90
-
by losfp on Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:30 pm
1 & 3 for me - great shots
Funny, I have a DSLR now, but still some of my absolute favourite shots were taken years ago with a p&s.
Better the shot taken because you're in the right place at the right time, than the shot you miss because you haven't lugged your expensive gear, or you are too busy fiddling with controls 
-

losfp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney
-
by Mitchell on Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:36 pm
Thanks Simon. The film was standard Kodak 100 ISO film.
The colours down there are incredible - there's no added pp saturation in these photos. The sun never sets in summer - it just stays low in the sky providing incredible lighting.
-

Mitchell
- Member
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
- Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris
-
by marcotrov on Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:47 pm
Lovely images. You can all but feel the nip in the air. Colour great and I just love #1 and #3 for their composition and sense of scale.
cheers
marco
-
marcotrov
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia
by stormygirl on Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:58 pm
These are simply amazing. Antarctica is on my travel wish list, so beautiful and almost untouched.
Very hard to pick a favourite out of the set, you have done well with scanning and PPing, particually if you haven't added saturation. Well done!
Can we see some more? Just stunning. 
-

stormygirl
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Melbourne, VIC
-
by Slider on Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:34 pm
One word. Awesome 
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by rokkstar on Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:49 pm
I'm trying to get Sam to go on our honeymoon to ANtarctica - it's definately on my travel wish list.
These shots are just great and really show off the majestic surreal nature of the continent.
I like #1 a great deal, the mirror like water is terrific, but the top right interjection distracts me.
The sense of scale in #2 is just awesome but the composition doesn't hold my interest I'm afraid.
#3 is wonderful - the scale if that iceberg(?) is just spectacular
The colours and juxtaposition of sujects in 4 works so well.
Great images Mitchell.
Matt
-

rokkstar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
- Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200
-
by LostDingo on Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:54 pm
#1 and #2 are my personal picks! The scale is much better with the people in in them, excellent work with the point and shoot!
-

LostDingo
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
- Location: Rozelle
by ABG on Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:11 pm
You lucky bastard. Great images of a spectacular environment. Thanks for sharing. PS. Was your visit for work, or for pleasure?
Andrew
-

ABG
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
- Location: Oatley, Sydney
-
by Mitchell on Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:20 am
Andrew - I am a lucky bastard. As part of my medical training at uni we had a number of occasions where we could organise to go and work somewhere interesting. I thought Antarctica would be great and the people at A&K travel were very nice in agreeing to let me come along at no cost, as the assistant doctor. It would have been too expensive for me to go any other way...
-

Mitchell
- Member
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
- Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris
-
by MATT on Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:25 am
These are spectacular, It is on my want to visit list also..
Thanks for sharing
MATT
-

MATT
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1748
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
- Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----
by MHD on Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:30 am
Mitchell wrote:Thanks Simon. The film was standard Kodak 100 ISO film.
The colours down there are incredible - there's no added pp saturation in these photos. The sun never sets in summer - it just stays low in the sky providing incredible lighting.
24 hours of the golden hour!
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by Nnnnsic on Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:53 am
Damn...
I imagine with how beautiful the place is, you'd get great photos no matter what provided they weren't blurry.
I still want to go there more than most other places...
-

Nnnnsic
- I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
-
- Posts: 7770
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
- Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW
-
by dooda on Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:41 pm
I'm super jealous. I'd love to see these in BW, but maybe that would make them too artsy.
Did you see the southern lights?
I also heard that the smell of penguin dung is quite strong but that was from a science worker over there.
I really like how film gives really great contrast right out of the developer. Pretty much all digital needs a curve adjustment unless you have a really contrasty lens.
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|