Variations on a subject

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Variations on a subject

Postby marcotrov on Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:43 pm

I welcome any comments and critique on the variations on my garden theme focussing on DOF variations. I have used my Sigma 150 macro on my D70 for this series.
Image
Image
Image

cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Matt. K on Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:05 pm

I Like them. They are bright and cheerful. Red theme. Good technical macros. Thet would look stunning as large prints...a series.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:11 pm

I like #1 and #2 in this series, they really have a exquisite quality to them.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby macka on Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:25 pm

Very striking and beautiful shots, I think. I particularly like second one.
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:18 pm

Marco, maybe I'm over macro'd at the moment, but of these #2 is the only one that works. In that I like the starburst effect you've managed with the foreground flowers and the great OOF buds.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby wendellt on Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:15 am

Marco I can see why you love Macro it has such an isolated dimension to it
the 3rd one has great composition with the flower at the botom corner and the out of focus area further isolatign and giving prominence to the main subject. I notice your one of the few who uses asymetrical composition to great effect, usually macro people centre the subject, an obvious solution

i would just make the 3rd a bit darker(shadow contrast) for better effect.
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby marcotrov on Fri Feb 24, 2006 8:10 am

Thanks for kind comments Craig and Macka. Matt I'll experiment with the series in print :)
Peter in the series I tried to show the progression of growth from tight buds to full flowered bloom whilst using depth of field to try to highlight this evolution. Sometimes you need a break from a style that has personally reached oversaturation. Perhaps you best not look at the next series :lol:
Wendell thanks for the in depth comment it helps me to reflect on how I tackle subjects and themes. :)
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby mudder on Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:38 pm

The composition has made a great difference with these, this is very interesting, a little bit different and very engaging for the viewer, your use of DOF has been very well executed, and with well thought out backdrops...

The series idea works well too... Look good as a printed series in a single frame...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Frankenstein on Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:55 pm

Marco,
I really like 2 and 3 - the viewpoints are different to the norm and the use of DOF is wonderful, especially in the 3rd one. I also like the overall "pinkness" of no. 3 - the small amount of background contrasting colour as well as the yellow stamens (?) on the flower combine really well to make a great image.

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques