Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Gordon on Fri Feb 03, 2006 4:59 am
Another image from my recent visits to Nowendoc National Park, the junction of Callaghans Swamp creek on the left with Myall Creek, to form Myall River.
This is a panorama from two 16 mm fisheye(!) lens photos, which turned out surprisingly well  There is some residual distortion but not so much its very obvious.
I'll try to revisit this spot sometime soon and make some larger panoramas with the 30mm lens ( or soon to arrive 20mm) now I have the panorama making process worked out, after several days and nights of experimentation. The previous set of 30mm photos I took for the pano arent quite suitable.
The Tiger Snake photos I recently posted were taken ~100metres downstream from where this was taken. Callaghans Rocks, about 1km upstream to the left from here form a narrow canyon and I made my way up there last visit, but will need waterproof protection for the cameras to get as far as I'd like to, as some swimming will be involved... although I couldn't get far enough last time to see if its possible to get through from the lower side. Going around and approaching from the top side is a major effort with high cliffs below very steep slopes.
Gordon
D70, D200, CP5700
-

Gordon
- Member
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:04 pm
- Location: Loomberah/Siding Spring Observatory
-
by Glen on Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:38 am
Gordon very impressive especially when you are told it is two fisheye shots
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Pa on Fri Feb 03, 2006 7:30 am
very nice photo gordon,ditto to what glen said.it looks like pretty place.
pa
-

Pa
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: old bar, NSW 2430
by Hlop on Fri Feb 03, 2006 8:06 am
Very nice pano, Gordon! Bit longer exposure would make water look more silky and IMHO image is a bit underexposed (1/3 of stop?) but everything else I like about it 
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-

Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by Gordon on Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:29 am
Hlop wrote:Very nice pano, Gordon! Bit longer exposure would make water look more silky and IMHO image is a bit underexposed (1/3 of stop?) but everything else I like about it 
Thanks for comments all.
yes, a 1 sec exposure instead of 1/125 would have been nice, but my hands arent that steady, even with a 16mm  I only carried what I could in my backpack on my mountainbike, and a large tripod wasnt part of that! Next time I'll probably park a bit closer and walk, so I'll have the tripod with me, although it will be more difficult getting to this place with some almost cliff like slopes to negotiate into the canyon and lots of boulders to climb over.
I dont think its underexposed, the highlights in the water are right on saturation, and I wouldnt want to increase the size of those white areas. Also it was a dull overcast day and quite dark under the undergrowth.
Gordon
D70, D200, CP5700
-

Gordon
- Member
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:04 pm
- Location: Loomberah/Siding Spring Observatory
-
by greencardigan on Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:33 am
Impressive pano. Would be best viewed on the big wide LCD that I don't have. 
-

greencardigan
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Wollongong
-
by avkomp on Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:08 am
I wouldnt have picked it as the product of 2 fisheye shots.
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by Hlop on Fri Feb 03, 2006 7:35 pm
Gordon wrote:I dont think its underexposed, the highlights in the water are right on saturation, and I wouldnt want to increase the size of those white areas. Also it was a dull overcast day and quite dark under the undergrowth.
What do you say about this version:
It's probably bit oversaturated but it's happened when I converted image to SRGB for web
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-

Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by mudder on Fri Feb 03, 2006 7:58 pm
Wow, this is with 2x16mm fish-eyes
Much prefer the second version with the extra sat and generally brighter, you've done a good job joining these and I admire your tenacity getting there... The shot was worth it though 
Aka Andrew
-

mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by Gordon on Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:17 pm
Hlop wrote:What do you say about this version:
It's probably bit oversaturated but it's happened when I converted image to SRGB for web
yes a bit oversaturated, greens like that are rare in the Aussie bush around here...you can find them in Ireland though
also brighter and more contrasty looking than it was on the day- which was mostly dull and overcast with muted colours with not a lot of contrast. I guess it depends on whether you prefer art or reality, I'd probably be happier with something in between the 2
Gordon
D70, D200, CP5700
-

Gordon
- Member
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:04 pm
- Location: Loomberah/Siding Spring Observatory
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|