No 1...

No 2 ...

bug macro picModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
bug macro pictook two pics and they have only one difference so i would like to know which one you like better ?
No 1... ![]() No 2 ... ![]() Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
I like number two better... It seems sharper?
![]() http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
#2... sharpness and dof.
cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
#2 - sharper ... but dead?
Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
I think I know what you've done here Shane but I'm not a betting man...
Prefer the second due to it's clarity - no competition. Last edited by Manta on Wed Jan 18, 2006 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
huh? I am sick you know
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Sorry Rel - I was thinking about your response while writing mine... Now I need a lie down! My apologies Shane - but my choice remains the same. ![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
the difference was ...
No 1 at f32 No 2 at f8 speed difference to suit. taken with the Tamron 90 macro using the tripod and mirror lockup. i thought the first one would be sharper and with more DOF but it surprised me and turned out the opposite. I will have to rethink the way i do macros from now on. Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
I found the same thing...
Diffraction plays a part at F32... When I was using my 180mm macro + 68mm extension tubes + 1.4x tc I was finding that using too small an appature resulted in very blurry pics... Much frustration followed until I learned about diffraction Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
I have the same lens but for a Nikon... i found the sweet spot for the tamron is f22... works like a charm and most of my images come out pretty good at that dof
Tim D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent
My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
thanks, will remember to go no lower than that
![]() Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|