Hat series - Portraits

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Hat series - Portraits

Postby rokkstar on Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:36 pm

Ok, I'm still trying to get to grips with studio lighting, backgrounds, posing, etc etc. It's all very exciting but one hell of a tough mother. Just when I think I've worked out one aspect another one needs answering!!

Anyway, I would appreciate C&C on this series - the hat is intentionally obscuring the eyes on three, but does it work?

Image
Image
No portrait session would be complete without the obligitory self shots!!!
Image
Image

Cheers
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Nnnnsic on Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:52 pm

First and second two are easily the best here.

I think you've given yourself too harsh a lighting on that last shot, evident with the flash spot on your nose. It might make a good b&w, but I think it's a tad too harsh in colour.

Also, you're cropping your hat just a bit too much for my liking in the third and losing some details out to the darkness where I think you could be separating them.

Great work regardless, though. :up:
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Oneputt on Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:19 pm

I like number two very much. the angled face gives it more appeal than the others, but they are all interesting.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby stubbsy on Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:51 pm

Matt

I've visited a few times trying to decide how I feel about these. They don't work for me and I've finally worked out why.

The lighting is spot on, but I think the hat is too big since it dominates the shot so much. With no eyes to grab my focus all I see is that giant hat. The last one of you with your favourite out and about headware works much better, but because that hat is white suffers from blown highlights as already mentioned.

What about a beret?
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Matt. K on Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:59 pm

I agree with Stubbsy....but I think if the hat was black it would demand less attention. Besides that I think the eyes are so powerful that it rarely is a good idea to hide them. I like the close-up simplicity of the shots and that is a hard thing to achieve...believe it or not. Maybe...if you are dead set on hiding the eyes,then introduce a hand or two close to...or touching, the face. Always a pleasure to look at your work Matt,
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby rokkstar on Sun Jan 08, 2006 7:54 pm

Thanks for the comments guys.

The hat obscuring the eyes was an idea I was thiking of and gave it a go and, being close to the project, couldn't decide whether it works or not. Although I still like the images I agree about lack of eye contact. Th4ese could work well if they were not such close and personal shots I'm thinking. If they were wider and incorporated more elements, such as a hand like Matt said.

Thanks again guys.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques