Comments appreciated.


PelicansModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
PelicansSimon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
the coulours are great around the eyes... the shots are nice and sharp... but there's just something with the composition that hasn't quite done it for me. <shrugs>
i like the light in the first one around the eyes... cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Thanks Mark. Back to the drawing board for me I suppose...
![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Simon
These do nothing for me either. Pelicans are beautiful birds and amazing up close. At the same time they are a real challenge photographically since their shape and size are hard to fit into a frame. For me the first fails because the shape of the bird is awkward and aesthetically unappealing and the second falls victim to a problem with many shots of this amazing bird in that it's just too tight a crop or else not tight enough (see below). My tips from lot's of (mostly failed) practice with these birds is to try the following:
HTH Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks Peter - I've got other shots depicting the sort of compositions you suggest so i'll have a play with those. I'm pleased to get some expert advice as I've not done much with pelicans in the past.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
I'll happily go against the grain here!
I like the first because of the unusual attitude of the bird. These are funny looking creatures, and this shot emphasises that. Imagine having to scratch yourself with that thing! I also like #2 because it is an exercise in shapes and colours. Well done Simon. ![]() TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Thanks for those comments Trevor. I specifically set out to get shots that were a little out of the ordinary as there have already been some stunning images of pelicans posted on this forum and I knew I couldn't even compete against those. In light of that, I looked on this as more as a style exercise highlighting, just as you said, the unusual shapes and colours that these birds possess.
I certainly can see Mark's and Peter's viewpoints that for them, as pelican shots, the images don't really cut it. That must be a sentiment echoed by many judging by the number of members who've viewed the shots but declined to comment. I'm pleased that you, and hopefully some other members, see something else in the shots but I'm also happy to hear criticism from anyone. I've had a pretty good run with the majority of posters liking my work in the past so I'm not at all miffed if I've failed to please everyone on this occasion. (Better than my recent polar bear post - no replies whatsoever on that one. Must have been a shocker!!) ![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Hey Manta,
I really like shot 2, I think the close up works really well. THe bird is in quite a "thoughtful" pose I think. Number 1 - hmmm, I'm not too keen on this one - The pose is just a little too contorted for my liking... why didn't you ask him to move? ![]()
Thanks K - glad you like the second one (I prefer it too). In the first one, you'll notice the water behind him is on an angle. I deliberately tilted the camera for this so as to keep the bird aligned, otherwise it would have looked weird. Seems I failed in my attempts to un-weird him anyway!! ![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanks Gerard. ![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Love your Pelican shots, we dont get many pelicans around the inner city harbour area of Sydney
Cheers Rod
Dargan - Should that be "pelicanality"?
![]() Matt - Let's not jump to any conclusions here. As far as I'm concerned we're just friends. Sandy - don't know why that is; we've got heaps of them up here. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|