lonely and cold

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

version 1 or 2???

1
1
14%
2
6
86%
 
Total votes : 7

lonely and cold

Postby flipfrog on Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:16 am

Image
Last edited by flipfrog on Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby krpolak on Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:27 am

This is definitelly very interesting landscape to shoot. But I can see two problems here:

1. Funny glow around the shed. My first impresion is that you have done some editing effect to push out the subject. I am not relly sure if this works.

2. Sky. At the moment you have got very bright area quite far away from you subject. That is not good, it puts viewer attention to rather irrelevant place. Try to imagine if sky is horizontally reversal. Then you would have two advantages:

a: bright part of sky give perfect background for the shed, which you propably tried to achieve by point no. 1

b. everything is placed in the right position to support your subject

Sorry if I am too critique.

Regards,

K.Polak
User avatar
krpolak
Member
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: North Sydney

Postby flipfrog on Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:34 am

nope
those are some great tips...

im gonna work on this pic again...it was a rush PP ....

thanks
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby flipfrog on Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:48 am

Image

another version....
critiques please..better? worse?
Last edited by flipfrog on Fri Jan 06, 2006 6:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:53 am

The second one looks more natural, but there is still what I percieve as a visible halo around the hut. However I like both versions, they both have a great atmosphere.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby flipfrog on Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:57 am

that halo is better from the first one, but the orig image had the barn waay underexposed, so i had to try various methods to up the barn a tad...
its been tricky....

going back i should have bracketed or at lest took the time to get the proper exposure...i was in a hurry as i asked my dad to pull over so i could take a quick shot while everyone in the car waited :P
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby ozimax on Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:19 am

What would I give for some snow at the moment? It's hot hot hot on the north coast at present. You've presented a picture of bleakness which is very interesting. Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby big pix on Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:23 am

2nd much better..........but still not quite there........ if the original is RAW try using LAB colour for your pp.......it is full of surprises
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby avkomp on Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:47 am

the first thing I noticed was the the halo and after that my eyes stay there and not really look at the overall scene.

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Geoff on Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:50 pm

Hi Dee,
THe 2nd is significantly better but I know you can do better with your PPing as the halo around the hut is still quite evident as it's already been said. Get back to work, then post! :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby rebel on Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:24 pm

I hope you don't mind, but I had a go at your image, and this is what I got:

Image
------------------------
Eugene Zemlyanskiy
Flickr Gallery!
rebel
Member
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:04 pm
Location: Seattle WA USA

Postby flipfrog on Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:52 am

i like...

but i think you have warmed up the tones a bit, and i was hoping to make this pic feel as cold as possible.......

if anyone is really bored, i will send the RAW file to them and you can play... PM me if u want it
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby big pix on Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:14 am

as requested.......

using lab color.....but could do with some more work.....
Image

using PSCS2 shadow highlight and auto color......
Image
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques