



First day with my D50Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
First day with my D50These images are from the first full day I had to play with my new D50. I am already impressed with the ease of use of the camera, and hopefully through critiques, I will actually become competent with it. Anyways, here are a few images that I was actually happy with. Please let me know areas where these images could be improved.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Wow, you have a good eye!
![]() Here's some critique: #1 The cocky itself is a bit underexposed. If you shot in RAW, you could fix this (in Nikon Capture for example) using a combination of D-lighting and/or exposure compensation. Other possibilities include spot-metering on the cocky or using fill-flash to light the subject whilst keeping the same exposure for the background as currently. The background and bokeh is wonderful. #2 Similar to #1, unfortunate that his crest has been cropped off too. ![]() #3 Yeah, like this one, maybe still a tad underexposed #4 Wonderful!! If I was truly picky I'd suggest getting the top of her head, plus the fingers on the right hand side in the frame. Damn nice first efforts! ![]()
Great camera hey mate! these seem all good to me. i think that just adding a bit of contrast to the first three, IMHO, might bring out the whiteness of the cockatoo a bit better. love the expression on the girls face on the last shot! What lens did you use for these shots? by the way have fun with it.
Cheers Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Hi Graphite,
Those are excellent shots and like the other guys said you seem to have a good eye for it as well!!! I think the first three would come up a treat with just a bit of PP and I love the last one as is!! Excellent effort for your first try and keep them coming ![]() TonyD D70 18-70mm Kit Lens, Nikkor70-300mm ED, Nikkor 50mm f1.8, Tamron 70-300MM F/4-5.6 LD MACRO 1:2, Sigma 28-200 1:4~5.6, TC-16A AF Teleconverter, SB-800 Nikon F60 Film Body.
![]()
Nathan, Glad to see you your up and posting, and man I've got to lift my game. First day out of the block and your producing some nice quality images there
![]() ![]()
graphite,
Welcome! First posting with fews keepers and thanks for sharing. Your entree served well, now we wait for the main course and dessert ![]() Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Thanks for the suggestions. After looking at the pictures of the cockatoo, I realise that they are underexposed, and I wish that I had been shooting in RAW. Unfourtunatly I was on my way to empty my memory card when the cocky landed, and I had to reduce the quality to get a bunch of pictures. Even that last picture of my daughter is in fine quality/Medium size. I wish that I had gotten at least that one in RAW, or at least fine/Large.
NJ - I used a Nikkor AF-S 55-200mm lens for the shots of the cockatoo. I did get others using the normal 18-55 mm as well, but I dont think they were as nice. For the shot of my daughter though, I used the 18-55mm lens. I have tried to bring out some contrast in the cockatoo shots. It proved more difficult than I thought it would be, as the feathers tend to burn out as soon as you move brightness or contrast values around. ![]() ![]() ![]()
Welcome, Graphite.
Lovely set of images to start your voyage with your d50 and this great forum. I learnt very quickly that shooting raw is the only way to go. Much more versatility for pp'ing your shots. Look forward to seeing more images from your d50. I love mine. Cheers, John JED
Nikon D600, D7000, D90, 70-300 D, 50mm f1.8, 85mm f1.8, 105mm macro f2.8, 18-70 kit lens, 35mm f1.8 dx, sigma 10-20 dx, SB600, SB80dx, Metz 45ct4, & other stuff. Why are there no cheap hobbies?
Nathan. If you're filling up your card I sure hope Santa gives you an extra one.
The rework of the cocky is a great improvment and I'm guessing that you learnt a bit about the value off PP in the process. The one of your daughter is great since you've done what's really essential to make an image like this grab your attention - your daughter's eyes are sharp and in focus and she's engaged with the viewer because of how she's looking out of the image at you. The outstretched OOF arms round this out. How many times have we all seen something just like this - please pick me up? Well done (but please not too many kiddy pics - you need to show us your versatility ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Nathan, if you've been hanging around Craig before you acquired the D50, I'd say for once he's been a good influence...
![]() Very impressive pics, you've mastered shallow depth of field work, and I'm sure you'll treasure the last one.
Yes, I think that for the most part, when I am taking pictures I will stay in RAW. I think the only exception to this is when I am taking photos of things because I have to. (ie. Dinner at the in-laws etc.) chances are, I will never do any PP to any photos like that, and all they will do is take up space. Of course the chance is that I will end up with a really good shot, and cant do much with it. The solution to that of course is to get a 2 gig memory card! I think I may have to save my pennies for that though since I dont think I can convince my wife to let me get one so soon after getting the camera.
stubbsy - Thank you for your comments on the reworked cocky. I have done a bunch of PP of photos in the past, but it has mainly consisted of editing and not playing around with contrast/color/levels etc. I think I should get the hang of it soon. I guess it is just getting your eyes adjusted to knowing what you want from a shot. Also, I will try not to do to many kid shots, I promise. I will only do it if I like the picture so much that it doesn't matter whos kids are in it (ie, I would like the picture even if the kids wernt my own.) Onyx - I dont think my wife would agree that Craig was a "Good" influence, after all, I ended up spending a chunk of money on a camera. Personally I am quite looking forward to being able to go around taking photos with someone. Also, I dont think I have mastered shollow depth of field. I think I ended up getting lucky and learned a bunch in the process. I will definitely treasure that last picture. I am thinking of putting it in my office.
Nathan
One other thing - the pic of your daughter has a decided blue colour cast (I'm assuming she has on a white top). I've taken the liberty of playing with your image to show you what I mean. Here i've altered the colour balance slightly to get back to white for the top - side effect is the image is a little warmer. (If you want me to remove the pic I'll do so). I suggest you try this on your original image with a little more care than I did. ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Wonderful shot Nathan of (I assume) your daughter. You'll have many more like these to come, as has been suggested a tad different crop and there you go!
Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Nice work on warming up the photo Stubbsy. Nathan and I had a very brief play and warmed up the original before we had to return to baby duties it makes a big difference.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|