

Moon - Close UpModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Moon - Close UpJust thought I would post a few close ups of some Moon craters..These were taken with my web cam and a 10 inch telescope...
![]() ![]() Canon
where these done making use of astrophotography software to port process the shots?
my old housemate uses some great software for stacking 500+ shots of a star or the moon and then use just the best pixels from each shot to make the final shot. ![]() Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
Is that a foot print I can see on the left of the first shot........very unusual but very interesting..........would like to see more of this ......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Wow. Makes the usual 1/4 frame efforts of a 400 or 500mm lens look pretty silly. Why the webcam? Just cause it was easier to position?
Dopeler Effect: The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.
Used the webcam because I use that for the planets...Take an avi then select the best frames to use for the final image. If you just try and get one shot, you are going to battle with the atmospheric conditions, so by taking an avi, you increase the chances of steady seeing in some of the frames. Also I like trying to push the envelope with all of my equipment...
You can get good results with your SLR camera and I have many fine examples to support this but the conditions have to be perfect. Using the webcam means you can image when the conditions are not perfect. If the stars are twinking, then the seeing is not perfect, when the stars are still, that is a good time to try with the SLR or a point and shoot. Hope that clears things up... Canon
Interesting idea. Think I'd go for heaps of shots with the SLR though; a good shot with an SLR imo would be much better than a good webcam shot.
Can't argue with the effectiveness of the telescope! Dopeler Effect: The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.
Skippy, when the conditions are not perfect, it is a pain in the but to take a bucket load of shots with the slr and then have to go through them all trying to find a keeper. Using the webcam, you only nedd to take a 30 sec avi at 5 frames per second and you are almost guaranteed a keeper. The software I use makes the taks of finding the good frames very easy.. I agree that when conditions are good, then nothing beats the high res of the slr.. like this
![]() or this one with jupiter at near the bottom of the moon ![]() Canon
Thanks for sharing some more of your fantastic shots Big V, as always they are truely inspiring stuff. The moon and jupiter shot, is Great!!!
Oh yeah, that's impressive.
See your point about the number of frames, it would be quicker with the webcam screencaptures. Also good for impressing an audience - webcam on a telescope producing those images would surprise most people. Dopeler Effect: The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.
Hi Big V, is it a celestron tracking telescope? using the right software you could track the moon with the celestron and just keep using the remote on the D70 to get a heap of shots all while the d70 is tethered to the same software that the celestron is controlled by. The same stacking and sorting system you mentioned would work just as well with the 6MP shots as it does with the webcam.
There are astronomical webcams available that usse a much, much higher bit depth to the images and despite the low overall megapixel count the sensitivity is such that they do get bloody good images out of them. Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|