Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by leek on Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:34 pm
I finally found time to take some test shots with my new Tokina 12-24 today.
I took all of the following shots with the D70 mounted on a tripod and with self-timer delayed shutter.
So that you can appreciate the context of the crops, here's the scene that I took (with minor post-processing):
Here are 4 centre crops at different apertures. All shots were taken at 12mm focal length, at 200 ISO with the D70 mounted on a sturdy tripod and using the self-timer to activate the shutter. No polariser was used for these shots (see later). Also no PP applied to crops:
1/1250 @ f4
1/320 @ f9
1/100 @ f16
1/60 @ f22
I don't really feel qualified to analyse the optical characteristics of these crops and would therefore invite the pixel-peepers amongst us to let me know what they think regarding sharpness, CA etc. Personally, I'm quite confused as the F4 shot seems to be the sharpest
Earlier in the day I took some shots further up the Lane Cove River with a CPL mounted... At 12mm, the filter causes some quite pronounced vignetting.
Is there any way of minimising this vignet? A better quality CPL perhaps?
-

leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
by Glen on Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:46 pm
John, maybe an ultrathin cpl, though I would try first. See if Birddy has one in that size or try Mainline Photographics at Crows Nest. Try and test first as it may not cure anything.
The first shot seems dark in the bottom left corner 
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by sirhc55 on Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:48 pm
John - with my aged eyes the f/4 does seem to be the sharpest but this is well within the context of most lenses having the sharpest images at f/4 thro f/8.

Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by big pix on Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:53 pm
yes that is the edge of your filter which will show when using 12mm........ you need an ultra thin cpl filter.......
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by birddog114 on Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:58 pm
Yes, thin CPL filter from Hoya and B+W (3mm) costs nearly 1/3 the price of that lens.
I'm sure Nikon 12-24 does not have this issue with standard 5mm CPL filter.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by gstark on Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:59 pm
John,
Do you have crops at f5.6 and f8?
The contrast seems to have dropped very sharply at f16 and f22, and it cetainly seems somewhjat soft at those apertures as well.
I'd like to see what this lens does at the more moderate apertures.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Antsl on Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:00 pm
You are right, the Tokina 12-24mm lens is very sharp wide open which is why I like it. Most lenses do get softer at the smaller apertures and this is because of a condition called the diffraction of light. What happens is that light will bend about an object, whether it be our sun (hence the reason why astronomers can observe stars behind the sun) or a human hair.
As we use smaller apertures what happens is that there becomes more perimeter of the actual metal aperture for the smaller surface area letting light through; the nett result is that at the very small apertures some of the light is bent away from its usual direction, thereby softening the image.
-

Antsl
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
- Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!
-
by stubbsy on Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:11 pm
Birddog114 wrote:Yes, thin CPL filter from Hoya and B+W (3mm) costs nearly 1/3 the price of that lens. I'm sure Nikon 12-24 does not have this issue with standard 5mm CPL filter.
Correct. I have the standard Hoya CPL on my nikkor 12-24 and no vignetting. Of course I paid a touch more for the lens than John did for his Tokina. 
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by leek on Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:32 pm
stubbsy wrote:Birddog114 wrote:Yes, thin CPL filter from Hoya and B+W (3mm) costs nearly 1/3 the price of that lens. I'm sure Nikon 12-24 does not have this issue with standard 5mm CPL filter.
Correct. I have the standard Hoya CPL on my nikkor 12-24 and no vignetting. Of course I paid a touch more for the lens than John did for his Tokina. 
Yes... let me see... $660 for the lens + $200 for an ultrathin filter... I still think I'm better off  Either that, or all my 12-24 shots will be displayed in pano-format 
-

leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
by leek on Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:33 pm
gstark wrote:John, Do you have crops at f5.6 and f8? The contrast seems to have dropped very sharply at f16 and f22, and it cetainly seems somewhjat soft at those apertures as well. I'd like to see what this lens does at the more moderate apertures.
Didn't take any at those apertures this time Gary, but I'll pop out again soon for another test...
-

leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
by thaddeus on Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:36 pm
Antsl wrote:Most lenses do get softer at the smaller apertures and this is because of a condition called the diffraction of light. What happens is that light will bend about an object, whether it be our sun (hence the reason why astronomers can observe stars behind the sun) or a human hair.
Great explanation, thanks!
-

thaddeus
- Member
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:04 pm
- Location: Sydney
by Onyx on Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:49 am
Fark, diffraction noticeably sets in between f/9 and f/16 shots - I suspect you'll get the sharpest image at f/11 or so.
I'm not terribly impressed by the chromatic abberation present in the crops, esp since they're crops from centre of frame, but I guess considering its price it's decent value glass - and there's always a software fix.
John, if you zoom in to say 14mm or so, until the vignetting disappears, and train yourself to use this field of view, you'll save from having to upgrade to a thinner CPL filter. 
-

Onyx
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
- Location: westsyd.nsw.au
-
by dooda on Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:08 am
One trick that I do sometimes if you have to be wide open, or if you only notice the vignette after, is to clone it out. I find the corners fairly easy to clone out without being noticed (people don't generally linger on the corners much).
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|