Another Portrait v Landscape preference

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Another Portrait v Landscape preference

Postby ozczecho on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:12 am

A couple of days ago we saw the same picture in Landscape and Portrait mode.

I took this picture on the weekend at Whale Beach and the only difference is that the portrait version has been cropped to make it landscape. I initially did that as an experiment after seeing some of Jaco portraits, but now I think it really works as it brings out the strength of my daughters blue eyes.

What do you think? Also does the colour look right? I did no colour modification whatsoever...

Portrait:
Image

Landscape:
Image

Thanks....

ozczecho
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:16 am

LOVE the landscape one, it's very strong and moving, brings out the eyes, and has a more personal feel to it as you feel 'closer'. I really prefer the landscape crop is this case, by a long way.
Great photo, and gorgeous kid.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby rokkstar on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:32 am

It might just be the size, but the landscape one, as alpha said, really emphasises her beautiful eyes. I don't mind losing the top of the head because theeyes are so engaging. I would say Landscape.
Very nice shot.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby rebel on Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:01 pm

Landscape!

The eyes are just beautiful! I'd be pround of this shot.
and the color really works for this image, I like it.

:)
------------------------
Eugene Zemlyanskiy
Flickr Gallery!
rebel
Member
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:04 pm
Location: Seattle WA USA

Re: Another Portrait v Landscape preference

Postby gstark on Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:08 pm

ozczecho wrote: I think it really works as it brings out the strength of my daughters blue eyes.


Actually, it's the tighter crop and larger size that's creating this illusion.

Try shooting the same (portrait) shot again, but with a much tighter crop, and then see what you think.

I personally prefer the portrait version, but feel that it could benefit from a tighter crop - at the time of shooting - at the top, while still keeping the hand in the image at the bottom.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Potatis on Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:46 pm

I agree with Gary. Portrait, and crop close to the head, or better still, crop through the top of the head like your landscape shot. (Although I'd crop just a fraction higher than your in landscape shot). My 2 cents.
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby ozczecho on Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:21 pm

Thanks for the feedback everyone. I'll try cropping the portait version a little tighter to see what difference it makes.

Any comments on the colour?
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby paulvdb1 on Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:33 pm

When I look at the portrait shot I note myself focussing on her forehead - maybe it's a rule of thirds thing. Possibly the eyes have ended up too low in the crop.

The Landscape works well - beautiful girl

On my crappy work monitor there seems to be a bit of a blue tint to the shot.
Regards, Paul Vandenberg

D7000 (D70S retired) - 18-70mm, 50mm F1.8, 35mm F2, Sigma 70-300mm
paulvdb1
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:22 pm
Location: NW Sydney

Postby Geoff on Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:11 pm

Wow wow wow!! This is an EXCELLENT portrait in both modes however I too prefer the landscape version, it is more intense and demanding, and as said really shows off her beautiful eyes. You should be VERY proud of this!!! :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby JordanP on Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:16 pm

Yep - of the two the landscape has more impact and draws attention to the eyes, so its the winner! I do agree with Gary that a tighter crop on the portrait shot would mimick and possibly enhance this. I see a slight blue shift on my monitor as well - perhaps warm the shot up a little and see how it looks.

Excellent shot,
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby mudder on Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:07 pm

The landscape oriented shot has much more impact and draws the viewer to those stunning eyes, but as mentioned I think that's only due to the different crop.
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Jonesy on Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:18 pm

WOW... I am with the majority and going for the landscape. It hit me first. and I am thinking that I would like to see it a little warmer.

but that is a keeper!
D4, D700, plus glass from 14mm to 200mm
Gaffa Tape is like the FORCE... it has a Light side, a Dark side and it holds the universe together
User avatar
Jonesy
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Mount Gambier SA

Postby Poon on Wed Nov 02, 2005 7:20 pm

Very nice.
---------------
Regards
Poon
User avatar
Poon
The HK Connection
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:32 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Postby mdboo on Wed Nov 02, 2005 7:30 pm

Landscape works for me... amazing shot !

=BlackWater=
The most secure computer in the world is one not connected to the internet. Thats why I recommend Telstra ADSL.
User avatar
mdboo
Member
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:05 pm
Location: CBD-South Australia-D300s

Postby dooda on Wed Nov 02, 2005 7:31 pm

It's a good shot, as a comparison it's more a matter of which crop works better, than which is the better format. In this case it's the landscape, the portrait is awkward, cutting into her hair on the right, yet leaving all that space on top. The landscape focuses on the face, with less extraneous background.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby Kris on Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:12 pm

what a cutie! I'd be framing that picture. What lense was used?
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby ozimax on Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Both great, landscape best for me, Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby ozczecho on Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:28 pm

Everyone thank you very much for your input.

Kris, the lens I used was a 50mm f/1.4, with center-weighted metering, f/3.5, 1/125s, iso 200.

Gary here is a tighter crop portrait version. After looking at the image at work I also "warmed it" up a little (thanks JordanP & Jonesy)

Image

Large Version

Cheers

ozczecho
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Marty on Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:52 pm

Thats a fantastic shot of a very photogenic girl.
I prefer the landscape mode, I love the crop on it.
Great work...
Marty
What does that button do....??
User avatar
Marty
Member
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Queenscliff, Nth Beaches, Sydney

Postby gstark on Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:24 pm

ozczecho wrote:Gary here is a tighter crop portrait version. After looking at the image at work I also "warmed it" up a little (thanks JordanP & Jonesy)


OK ....

This is a tighter crop still, and I've warmed it up even more.

Image

Interestingly, within the bounds of this forum, it still looks cooler than it does either directly or in NCE.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:31 pm

That is just one beautiful shot of your gorgeous daughter - those eyes will make many a heart swoon in years to come :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby ozczecho on Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:55 pm

Geez Gary thats a great crop. :D

Also I made the 2nd version warmer but your one is warmer still and IMHO looks great. I am assuming you used NC and the White Balance control to warm it up. What value did you use?...I wanna play some more.

Thanks for this effort.


sirhc55...those eyes are going to make me a very worried father in about a decade (or more) :D
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Geoff on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:16 pm

Oz,
I SERIOUSLY encourage you to get this printed on canvas..blow it up and frame it on your wall...I have been back to this thread several times...

I can tell you that I have heard good things about BigPrints.

http://www.bigprints.com.au
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Kris on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:17 pm

Thanks for the info - here here, print that she will love it in years to come.

Great shot once again
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:25 pm

I agree with Geoff on getting this pic printed and would go one further and suggest submitting some pics to creative agencies - your daughter has one helluva future with her eyes :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Geoff on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:29 pm

Good suggestion Chris, but Oz...do your research before going down that path! This is sensational :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby gstark on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:38 pm

ozczecho wrote:Geez Gary thats a great crop. :D


Thanx.

That's what I think you should have aimed for in the camera. :)

Do you still feel that the landscape image has more impact or is better? I think that you have shot a very compelling image.


Also I made the 2nd version warmer but your one is warmer still and IMHO looks great. I am assuming you used NC and the White Balance control to warm it up. What value did you use?...I wanna play some more.


If I had access to the NEF, I would have probably looked at the WB, but in this instance I hit the green and red channels just a little, and yes, in NCE.

I think it was red up a little, and green down ... what was the orignal WB setting btw? It looks pretty good IAC.
Last edited by gstark on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby kipper on Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:45 pm

Kudos to echo for capturing the shot, kudos to Gary for the crop. When I saw the landscape I thought it was pretty good but I love what Gary has done. I knew there were something a miss with the landscape. The subject was slightly off centre and there seemed to be a lot of space either side that was wasted/useless. I like the newer crop as it's fairly tight around the facial features and retains the young girls hands in the photo.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby ozczecho on Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:00 am

Geoff, wow thanks. I will definately look at BigPrints. Thanks for the link.

Kris, no probs mate.

sirhc55...seriously, wow...OK might have to do some research into that.

Gary, the portrait image looks great. Initially when I did the landscape crop I fell in love with it and maybe discarded any other way.

The original WB was Daylight+Sunshine. I warmed it up by selecting cloudy. BTW whats IAC stand for? :oops: If you want access to nef i can post it up.
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby gstark on Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:24 am

ozczecho wrote:Gary, the portrait image looks great. Initially when I did the landscape crop I fell in love with it and maybe discarded any other way.


Always a danger. :)

But there's a reason that it's called "portrait" mode. :)

The original WB was Daylight+Sunshine. I warmed it up by selecting cloudy. BTW whats IAC stand for? :oops: If you want access to nef i can post it up.


Posting it here won't be appropriate; please send it to my gmail account,; I'll have a play .... gary.stark@gmal.com

IAC - In Any Case .....
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby TonyH on Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:52 am

The final crop is the best.

Your daughter has incredible eyes.......

Well Done!

Regards

Tony
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby gstark on Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:12 am

Mike has sent me the NEF, and I've now created two more crops.

These are high quality jpgs, and I've not resized them, so they're big-ish files.

Try here and here.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby ozczecho on Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:40 am

Awesome job Gary. Thanks heaps for helping me out. I will checkout the nef file tonight.

Cheers

ozczecho

(MikeB)
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:49 am

Nice work Garry, it shows what a dramatic affect a little tweaking can do, (if you know what your doing). As has been said before, this should be sent to the printer then framed!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Dougie on Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:23 pm

Mike
I agree with the majority in that the landscape was fantastic, but what Gary did with your shot - Wow
Doug
As soon as you make something idiot proof they build a better idiot.
Dougie
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Gladstone Qld

Postby MATT on Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:54 pm

Holly err.. , Wow Gary the tight landscape crop that you did was awesome.

Now I have to go back over all my pics again and look at differnet crops.

I guess it also shows the power of shooting NEF's..

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Postby gstark on Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:00 pm

MATT wrote:I guess it also shows the power of shooting NEF's..


Yes, but (having had a play with the NEF) it also re-illustrates (to me, IAC) the value of cropping in-camera, which I think I may have suggested to Mike earlier in the piece.

I've not posted the full original here, but suffice to say that there was plenty cropped out of the image, even in Mike's first rendition of this. I readily accept that there are times when you can't fill the frame as you wish, and noting that this image was shot with the 50mm, and in a car, it may well be circumstantial that Mike was precluded from getting coser to the subject.

While, for smaller prints this is not an issue, this is such a wonderful image that I would love to see it printed at A3+ and then framed, but I suspect the severity of the crop is going to hamper this, and that is where we lose out.

C'est la vie.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby LostDingo on Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:03 pm

ozczecho-wonderful capture of a lovely girl, as everyone else has already mentioned as you well know "what wonderful and captivating eyes :!: "

Gary-your mastery of the crop and color enhancement has made a wonderful capture into a "WOW :!: " Great Work :wink:
User avatar
LostDingo
Senior Member
 
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
Location: Rozelle

Postby ozczecho on Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:00 pm

gstark wrote:
Yes, but (having had a play with the NEF) it also re-illustrates (to me, IAC) the value of cropping in-camera, which I think I may have suggested to Mike earlier in the piece.

I've not posted the full original here, but suffice to say that there was plenty cropped out of the image, even in Mike's first rendition of this. I readily accept that there are times when you can't fill the frame as you wish, and noting that this image was shot with the 50mm, and in a car, it may well be circumstantial that Mike was precluded from getting coser to the subject.

While, for smaller prints this is not an issue, this is such a wonderful image that I would love to see it printed at A3+ and then framed, but I suspect the severity of the crop is going to hamper this, and that is where we lose out.

C'est la vie.


Not wrong Gary, comes down to experience. I set my camera up for the shot (center weighted metering, Aperture Priority) but the framing wasnt spot on. In this case the orig image was 2000*3008 and Gary tight crop comes in @ 1116*1539. I know need to work out what max size print I can get....
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques