Cricket

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Cricket

Postby ghost on Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:47 am

Well, to be totally honest, not much happens at a 7 year olds cricket game. Unless your into "wides" and "no balls" your not going to have too much fun! Luckily :? :? I was there to catch the action :?:

Image

Image
User avatar
ghost
Banned
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 9:03 am
Location: Banned due to dishonesty and disrespect

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:53 am

Really like these anymore in the series ? I was never allowed to play cricket as a kid (and I love the sport) so it's nice to see some little tackers out enjoying the game. The wicket keeper looks like he's concentrating pretty hard. If you have any more please post them.
:lol:
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby ghost on Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:26 am

Thanks Alpha.....a few more:

I have titled the first one "Waiting" as everyone in the shot seems to be doing it!

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
ghost
Banned
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 9:03 am
Location: Banned due to dishonesty and disrespect

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:34 am

Cool, thanks for sharing. Looks like at least one bowler found the mark :)
What lens were you using, and did you have to be completely of the field ?? Had you considered making any of the shots available to other parents, I'd consider buying them if my kid was in them..(not that I have one).
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby ghost on Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:57 am

Well picked up :lol: Yes that bowler did find the mark.
70-200VR and not on the field. Images are cropped (obviously). I have decided a converter is required to seriously shoot this sport.
User avatar
ghost
Banned
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 9:03 am
Location: Banned due to dishonesty and disrespect

Postby Derek on Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:59 am

Lovely pictures, ghost. I just love them. Thanks a lot :D

ghost wrote:Well picked up :lol: Yes that bowler did find the mark.
70-200VR and not on the field. Images are cropped (obviously). I have decided a converter is required to seriously shoot this sport.


I am facing the same problem but cannot make up my mind. TC17 or TC 20, TC20 or TC17???
Derek
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Postby Glen on Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:07 am

Ghost, great shots with a really nice feel to them.



Derek, the 1.7 is a better compromise, the 2 is a little soft.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Derek on Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:21 am

Glen wrote:Derek, the 1.7 is a better compromise, the 2 is a little soft.


Hi Glen, thanks for your opinion :D
Derek
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Postby Geoff on Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:20 am

Lovely shots there Ghost - good memories. I like your d70user name :).
Could you please put in your profile where you are from. It helps other members etc who may like to help you out or you may find a fellow DSLRuser that lives just around the corner from you. Cheers.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques