OVERTIME (dial up warning)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

OVERTIME (dial up warning)

Postby LOZ on Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:15 am

Are their any set rules to architecture pic .What rules have I broken with this one
Image
Sorry for such a large file but it looked crap when it was exported any smaller .LOZ
User avatar
LOZ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Hills

Postby marcotrov on Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:32 am

Loz not a bad effort at all. May lack a little contrast and so called 'Pop' factor. The whole picture looks a little muted. Perhaps some experimental PP'ing(curves adjustment might help).

Also maybe a little change to composition to either lift the profile of the reflected building's image in the whole scene by changing position a little to be a little more considerate of the rule of thirds in the positioning of the main building's apex in the whole image and/or the reflected buildings position relative to the whole image. Perhaps different crops of the building to see which works visually the best for different times of the day.

I also think trying this shot much closer to dusk when the last vestiges of daylight are fading. This would make dramatic use of the fluro lighting in the building and add a little more separation between building and sky. Hope this makes sense and is of some use?
A caveat here though I am definetly no architectural photography expert, I think, neanderthal like would better describe my abilities with architecture. :roll:
Great effort though. :?
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby stubbsy on Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:44 pm

Loz

Niceley composed, but I'm with Marco about the reflected building. This adds great interest, but I'd like to have seen more of it (of course this depends on what the stuff we aren't seeing might detract from the shot). Still a great image. Try it in B & W.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby LOZ on Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:26 pm

Image
Image



Are these any better ? LOZ
Last edited by LOZ on Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
LOZ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Hills

Postby marcotrov on Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:28 pm

can't see anything on my screen Loz :?
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby LOZ on Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:31 pm

fixed :oops: :oops: :oops:
User avatar
LOZ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Hills

Postby cc@t on Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:44 pm

Loz
I much prefer both the uncropped versions - more visually interesting for me..
User avatar
cc@t
Member
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 10:34 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Postby marcotrov on Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:26 pm

Loz that's looking pretty good and good colour wise as well.

I've included a couple of crops etc (hope you don't mind) but the combinations are endless depending on what you want the image to say or the look you want to achieve(jpeg compression artefacts aside).

There are subtle differences in some of these images in terms of cropping and rotation of canvas. Some provide less balance right and left etc. but the key is playing around. I haven't even attempted landscape format crops and truncations but you can experiment to your hearts content also with hue saturation colour, balance, filters etc.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Hell i'm going overboard,sorry, but for what it's worth here is the same photo with a bit of tonal and colour manipulation, don't know what it will look like or what you think but i hope it gives you a quick idea, loz. It's alot of subjective opinion when it all boils down.
Image
Image
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby wendellt on Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:46 pm

I like the original one better it's more intimate crop and much more simplified allowing for deeper analysis of the geomtric elements, the other ones just show too much nothing special pretty much what you see is what you get 1:1. In the first shot i can see the receeding lines clearly, the cut off lights in the interior and the nice relection at the bottom that grounds the image, I like the way the image is cropped and presented with these 3 elements, any more and the image would be presenting too much.

to improve the first shot iwould just make sure when you frame at least one of the lines meet up in one of the corners, but that's it, the slight tilt and perspective give the shot a unique quality an excellent 1st image.
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:15 pm

Loz

I diagree with Wendell. The newer, less cropped version is WAY more interesting since you get the beauty of the other building and its reflection as well. Maybe I'd cut a sliver off the bottom so we don't see that little bit of building in the left. And both B &W and colour work for me. Well done.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby LOZ on Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:49 pm

Thanks wendellt ,marcotrov ,cc@t and stubbsy.
Far too often I find myself in strange cities and usually having a couple of hours each end of the day I walk around and enjoy the sights. In this time their is usually very little of interest apart from the surrounding buildings .Since owning my dslr I find it to be a great tool to fill in time and play around at night with the pic that I have taken during the day..

One day maybe their will be a great keeper .These tips that you and others have given will be used to find that once in a life time shot, thanks again .LOZ
User avatar
LOZ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Hills


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques