Independent tests at Australian Consumer Association has shown that Everready NiMhs are the best at holding a charge.
http://www.choice.com.au
Of the tested batteries, here are the BEST results in order of preference.
ENERGIZER Rechargeable 2300 	$5.50
DIGITOR Rechargeable 2000 	$5.00
KODAK MAX Rechargeable Digital Camera 2100 	$7.00
FUJIFILM Rechargeable 2100 	$5.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit hard to read but here are the test results.
Performance
Brand / 
model (in rank order) 	Overall score (%)1 	Value for
money score(%) 2 	Consistency score (%) 3 	Environment score (%)4 	Type 	Price per battery ($)*
ENERGIZER Rechargeable 2300 	86 	91 	67 	90 	NiMH 	5.49
DIGITOR Rechargeable 2000 	84 	83 	91 	80 	NiMH 	5.00
KODAK Max Rechargeable Digital Camera 2100 (A) 	82 	82 	84 	80 	NiMH 	6.98
FUJIFILM Rechargeable 2100 	81 	82 	78 	80 	NiMH 	4.98
SANYO Advanced 2300 (B) 	73 	86 	28 	80 	NiMH 	5.00
MAHA POWEREX 2200 (C) 	67 	63 	70 	70 	NiMH 	4.99
JACKSON Rechargeable 2000 	59 	51 	58 	70 	NiMH 	6.48
POWERBASE 2300 (D) 	57 	59 	32 	70 	NiMH 	7.49
DURACELL Ultra M3 Technology 	21 	2 	100 	0 	Alkaline 	2.09
ENERGIZER e2 Lithium 	21 	2 	100 	0 	Lithium 	4.99
KODAK Max Digital Camera (E) 	21 	1 	100 	0 	Oxy alkaline 	3.25
PANASONIC Primary Nickel for Digital Camera (F) 	21 	2 	100 	0 	Primary nickel 	1.67
Table notes
* Recommended retail price according to manufacturer info in October 2004.
(A) Has been upgraded to 2300 mAh, but 2100 mAH stock may still be available.
(B) Will soon be replaced by a 2500 mAh 
model.
(C) Available over the internet: 
http://www.nznature.co.nz/mshop/spi//2_sol_1757.
(D) Has been upgraded to 2500 mAh, but 2300 mAH stock may still be available.
(E) Will soon be upgraded.
(F) Has been replaced by "Oxyride" 
model, but may still be available.
1 Overall score
This consists of the following:
    * Value for money score: 50%
    * Consistency score: 25%
    * Environment score: 25%
2 Value for money score
We continuously drained and recharged four samples of each battery 250 times in a scenario simulating continuous use in a digital camera. We then calculated the average running time you get per dollar of their purchase price and converted that to a percentage score.
    * For the NiMH 
models, the score is based on the price for four batteries plus a quick-charger, and a life of 250 cycles.
    * For the non-rechargeable 
models included in the test for comparative purposes, the score is based on four batteries.
3 Consistency score
We scored the drop in the time the batteries lasted between the first and 250th cycles. A large drop means the 
model is less likely to last for as many cycles as a 
model that keeps its capacity. And the bigger the drop, the more likely it is you’ll become frustrated by its changing performance.
4 Environment score
Based on the number of alkaline batteries the rechargeable prevents from going to landfill.