I am starting to prefer it over Nikon Capture.
The only thing that I dont like is that sometimes it renders oversaturated skin tones. Other then that it is fast and work very well
Raw Shooter Essentials 2005Moderator: Moderators 
		
			Forum rules 
	Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. 
            Previous topic • Next topic 
			8 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
Raw Shooter Essentials 2005For those of you who have tried it, what are your opinions?
 
                  
            
				I am starting to prefer it over Nikon Capture. The only thing that I dont like is that sometimes it renders oversaturated skin tones. Other then that it is fast and work very well Last edited by huynhie on Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
					
				 
			
		
 I love using the program  
                  
            Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone 
		Come follow the rabbit hole... 
 I've been having trouble getting my version of Raw shooter essentials  to open.....is there a limit to the trial version? 
                  
            Bob
 
		"It is always the instantaneous reaction to oneself that produces a photograph." Robert Frank http://www.flickr.com/photos/rjlhughes/ 
 Bob, there shouldn't be any issues with the trial version as there aren't any limits. 
                  
            Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone 
		Come follow the rabbit hole... 
 Thanks that's re-assuring,
 
                  
            must be my computer - pass me that hammer! I might just unclog the bit of the mechanical brain that's full of topic reply notifications from gstark. I hope he won't be offended if I delete some of his emails. He must spend all day writing emails about updated topics I reckon. Bob
 
		"It is always the instantaneous reaction to oneself that produces a photograph." Robert Frank http://www.flickr.com/photos/rjlhughes/ 
 From the makers of Bibble IIRC. The layout and keyboard shortcuts all supposedly add to improve workflow.
 
                  
            
		In terms of usage I prefer it over ACR/CS2. In terms of results, I still sometimes prefer Capture... as huynhie mentioned, skintones. Also as pippin88 pointed out, RSE doesn't alter the NEFs, it saves changes in a subdirectory. This might be an important long term issue if you consider opening a NEF in say Capture, making absolutely no changes and saving/overwriting the file, you end up with a smaller filesize.... what's being thrown out?! 
 I really like how it works, the 123 thing rocks. 
 
                  
            One thing that worries me is that I have some shots of a Black Shouldered Kite and it has very red eyes. When I open it in Capture, and when RSE is previewing the eyes are red. When RSE renders the image properly the red eyes go black. As I can tell it doesn’t have an anti-red-eye feature so I don't know what’s going on. I'll post the raw and respective renderings when I'm home tomorrow evening. http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~fou ... d_kite.htm is what the eyes look like... and they were even brighter in the sunlight. L. D70s, 18-70, SB800, Nikkormat FTn, CP4500, Sigma 70-300 APO DG, Sigma 135-400 APO,  Lensbabies 2.0, Brian's Hot Tub, Lack of talent, etc. 
		
 
            Previous topic • Next topic  
			8 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
 |