Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Aussie Dave on Tue Nov 01, 2005 5:34 pm
Dave Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
-

Aussie Dave
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]
by jethro on Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:42 pm
The kit lens aint too bad at all. these are very satisfactory results. Well shot and the exposure is fine as well
jethro
shoot it real.
look! and see. Shoot and feel
-

jethro
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
- Location: down south, sydney
by BBJ on Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:58 pm
Bloody boodifull, 
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X 80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
-

BBJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3651
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
- Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X
-
by Alpha_7 on Tue Nov 01, 2005 7:11 pm
I agree with BBJ, lovely kids and beautiful moments. I'm not experienced with Portraits, so I'm sorry I can't offer more feedback.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by Potatis on Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:25 pm
I'm a huge fan of the kit lens, especially on a Benro tripod - very sharp. And once again I am reminded that the SB800 is the next item on my shopping list.
These photos are superb.  Very well done with the PP too! I'm sorry I can't offer any constructive criticism. To me, they are all excellent. 
Doug C.
-
Potatis
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
- Location: Mosman
-
by BBJ on Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:33 pm
They are just it, too darn good i wouldn't change a thing about these pics at all, captures there spirit, love them.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X 80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
-

BBJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3651
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
- Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X
-
by drifter on Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:37 pm
The 3rd and 4th shots are superb .Really well framed ,exposures great and you can see there eyes which really makes these stand out . The first two don't quite work due to them looking away from the camera or to no where in particular if you know what i mean .
-

drifter
- Member
-
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
- Location: Croydon -Sydney
-
by rog on Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:27 pm
Great shots! My only suggestion would be to consider shooting at the eye level of your subjects. It can be more empowering when the shots aren't looking down on them.
- Rog
-- Rog
Canon 20D, 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS, 70-200mm f/4 L, 50mm f/1.8, 420EX Speedlite, Benro C327 & KB2 + bits
-

rog
- Member
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 9:36 am
- Location: Gladesville, Sydney, Australia
-
by Jamie on Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:36 pm
Very nice Dave.
Only things i dont like....
The first two images of your neice - you cant see her eyes at all. I dont really like the traditional childrens portrait where they have to look right down the lens and smile, id much rather see (in most cases) images of them going about their own thing while still capturing their eyes. (hope you understand what i mean)
The first one of your nephew is great! Love it. Just watch out for the background though, he nearly has a peice of timber running through one ear and out the other. BTW, you are still welcome to borrow my 50mm 1.8 lens anytime you feel the need.
Jamie
D70s - Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF - Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G AF - Nikon SB600
-
Jamie
- Member
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:40 pm
- Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne <D70>
-
by Aussie Dave on Wed Nov 02, 2005 7:45 am
thank you everyone for sharing your thoughts. I agree that the kit lens & SB800 make a great duo. I only ever speak very highly of the SB800, I believe it's one of Nikon's finest achievements to date. I'd love to get a 2nd one but I guess that will need to stand in line with the rest of the equipment I lust after
I also see the point a few of you have raised in regards to having the subjects eyes showing. IMO, the second one (with my niece looking at the handful of sand), does not suffer too much, as you can at least see what she is looking at. The first however, I feel could have been a much better shot. I will try to remember this very good point for next time.
I guess that's the difference between a great photographer and an average one. A great photographer remembers what will make the shot better "at the time of taking the shot". An average photographer will remember when they look back on their work !
Thanks you very much for your kind offer Jamie. I am hoping to secure my own very, very soon...however if I find I am need of one before that happens I have your number
If anyone else has comments or suggestions, I would be very happy for you to post your thoughts.....even if you don't think you are qualified to offer cristisism 
Dave Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
-

Aussie Dave
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]
by Sheetshooter on Wed Nov 02, 2005 7:53 am
Dave,
You've done well again and I concur with soime of the other comments about coming down to their level and so forth - it should be a quite informative thread for you.
My only other comment would be that, as well as these have worked, try working WITHOUT the flash. Natural light in the real world presents so many wonderful and unique opportunities it seems a shame to thow the baby pout with the bathwater by making the illumination so axial and uniform.
Then again, what else would you expect me to say - I have always had a deep and compelling disdain for flash on camera for just the sorts of reasons I've expressed.
Cheers,
_______________
Walter
"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
-
Sheetshooter
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 891
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
- Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt
by Aussie Dave on Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:00 am
Sheetshooter wrote:Dave,
You've done well again and I concur with soime of the other comments about coming down to their level and so forth - it should be a quite informative thread for you.
My only other comment would be that, as well as these have worked, try working WITHOUT the flash. Natural light in the real world presents so many wonderful and unique opportunities it seems a shame to thow the baby pout with the bathwater by making the illumination so axial and uniform.
Then again, what else would you expect me to say - I have always had a deep and compelling disdain for flash on camera for just the sorts of reasons I've expressed.
Cheers,
thanks SS. Some sound advice there. I think I love the SB800 so much, I almost always automatically use it (unless I am outside in great lighting)....however, with the weather being overcast on the weekend I shot the above pics, the natural light probably won't get more even. Perhaps if I'd thought about it, I would have tried turning the flash off.
Looks like I'm still @ average photog status
Thank you for your suggestion ! I have taken it onboard.
Dave Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
-

Aussie Dave
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|