| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by stubbsy on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:00 pm
 Went to a friend's 40th birthday party at the weekend.  No decisive moments, but gave my newly acquired SB800 a workout.  Makes a huge difference - especially no more redeye!.  Liked this candid of a friend's daughter doing kara0ke (taken with 24-120 VR)
   and this one taken using the 50/1.4 which is just a magic lens:
   Edit: Damn word sensor - altered spelling of that singing in public thing    Edit: #2 - got me again -if you put k a r a o k e (without the spaces) you get mate in public and if you put k a  r a o k 3 you get a night in the gutterLast edited by stubbsy  on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:16 pm, edited 3 times in total.
					
				 
			
				 stubbsy
Moderator Posts: 10748Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pmLocation: Newcastle NSW - D700
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Glen on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:08 pm
 Both are excellent Stubbsy, you must be the only person to master an SB800 first up http://wolfeyes.com.au  Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable  wolf eyes flashlight surefire  torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torchThank You  
			
				 Glen
Moderator Posts: 11819Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Neutral Bay -   Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by MHD on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:08 pm
 What do you mean no descisive moments?? there are descisive moments EVERY where! 
			
				 MHD
Moderator Posts: 5829Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pmLocation: Chicago Burbs
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by sheepie on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:09 pm
 you have caught that elusive 'glint in the eye' I like from this flash - were you using the reflector? *** When getting there is half the fun! *** 
			
				 sheepie
Key Member Posts: 3029Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 amLocation: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia           *** Nikon D200/D70 ***
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by stubbsy on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:10 pm
 Glen wrote:Both are excellent Stubbsy, you must be the only person to master an SB800 first up
 Well that's the puzzle for me.  I've heard heaps about how hard the thing is to master and how useless the manual is so I just went out and took the shots and it seemed to work OK.  Maybe the hard part is getting it to do all the things you pay the extra $$ for over the SB600 (like commander mod e).  In any case I won't leave home without it. 
			
				 stubbsy
Moderator Posts: 10748Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pmLocation: Newcastle NSW - D700
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by stubbsy on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:13 pm
 sheepie wrote:you have caught that elusive 'glint in the eye' I like from this flash - were you using the reflector?
 I used the (much maligned) diffusion dome and also had the wide diffision thingie inside folded over the head and then angled the head so it pointed at the roof opposite where the lights were if that makes sense.  Guess this is bounce flash   
			
				 stubbsy
Moderator Posts: 10748Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pmLocation: Newcastle NSW - D700
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by sheepie on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:17 pm
 stubbsy wrote:Guess this is bounce flash  
 as opposed to the less enjoyable term - 'the flashed bounced'
  *** When getting there is half the fun! *** 
			
				 sheepie
Key Member Posts: 3029Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 amLocation: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia           *** Nikon D200/D70 ***
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by wendellt on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:37 pm
 Peter
 How did you get the glowing effect on the second picture?
 Looks very nice
 
 Maybe you should start glamour photography
 
			
				 wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.) Posts: 4078Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 amLocation: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by yeocsa on Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:51 pm
 Very nice and natural.  First picture a bit soft - no enough DOF.  Nikon flash is very easy to use - no fuss - just point and shoot.  Canon is a different story.
 regards,
 
 Arthur
 
			
				yeocsa
			Senior Member Posts: 966Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pmLocation: Melbourne 
 
		
		
			
			
 by stubbsy on Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:06 pm
 wendellt wrote:Peter
 How did you get the glowing effect on the second picture?
 Looks very nice
 
 Maybe you should start glamour photography
 Used the Nik Color Efex  Classical Soft Focus filter addin in Nikon Capture (although could also have used the PS  CS version in PS  CS) 
			
				 stubbsy
Moderator Posts: 10748Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pmLocation: Newcastle NSW - D700
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by stubbsy on Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:08 pm
 yeocsa wrote:Very nice and natural.  First picture a bit soft - no enough DOF...
 Arthur you're spot on in that regard and it's the one thing that decided me against using this as a Decisive Moment submission. 
			
				 stubbsy
Moderator Posts: 10748Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pmLocation: Newcastle NSW - D700
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by sirhc55 on Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:09 pm
 Peter - it is a great piece of equipment and you had it in one - great pics.
 Don’t know if you noticed on saturday but I was using the SB800 with the 70-200 for the pics I shot - I find it invaluable.
 Chris--------------------------------
 I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
 
			
				 sirhc55
Key Member Posts: 12930Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pmLocation: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10 
 
		
		
			
			
 by stubbsy on Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:18 pm
 sirhc55 wrote:Don’t know if you noticed on saturday but I was using the SB800 with the 70-200 for the pics I shot - I find it invaluable.
 I didn't Chris, but I have to say this is a very impressive adjunct to the camera.  Maybe we need an SB800 meet in Sydney like the Brisbane guys are having/had 
			
				 stubbsy
Moderator Posts: 10748Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pmLocation: Newcastle NSW - D700
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by PiroStitch on Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:30 pm
 The second pic is ace     Mmmm wide open goodness...the lens     you dirty minded ppl    
			
				 PiroStitch
Senior Member Posts: 4669Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 amLocation: Hong Kong
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by rokkstar on Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:29 pm
 That second pic is beautiful Peter.
 It helps having attractive mod els but the treatment is lovely.Matt 
			
				 rokkstar
Senior Member Posts: 1432Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pmLocation: Miserable cold wet England - D200
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by gstark on Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:38 pm
 stubbsy wrote:Edit: #2 - got me again -if you put k a r a o k e (without the spaces) you get mate in public and if you put k a  r a o k 3 you get a night in the gutter
 As well you should!
 g.Gary Stark
 Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
 The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
 
			
				 gstark
Site Admin Posts: 22926Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pmLocation: Bondi, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Andoru on Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:14 pm
 Well done mate! I'm starting to really dig into this i-TTL stuff. Looks lovely. 
			
				 Andoru
Member Posts: 195Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:10 amLocation: Sydney 
 
		
		
			
			
 by ozczecho on Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:07 pm
 Both pics are great....I am getting flash lust ....and these pictures wont help me get over it    
			
				 ozczecho
Senior Member Posts: 785Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pmLocation: Beecroft, Sydney 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Heath Bennett on Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:29 pm
 Well done Peter. The babe gives you an unfair advantage, but then again it may be your lighting making her look so good   HB 
			
				 Heath Bennett
Senior Member Posts: 1351Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:49 pmLocation: Morisset/Bonnells Bay 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Alex on Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:59 pm
 Peter,
 The 2nd shot is superb. Have to get SB-800. Now, back to my tax return!
 
 Alex
 
			
				 Alex
Senior Member Posts: 3465Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pmLocation: Melbourne - Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by stubbsy on Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:05 pm
 Thank you all for the comments.  While the mod el in the second shot did help with the look of the image I'd have to give some credit to the SB800 and the 50mm/1.4 too in giving the nice glow (and maybe even the photog had a small role to play    ) 
			
				 stubbsy
Moderator Posts: 10748Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pmLocation: Newcastle NSW - D700
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by wendellt on Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:40 pm
 yeah the 50mm 1.4 is a fantastic lens
women love staring down it's short but utterly charming barell.
 
			
				 wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.) Posts: 4078Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 amLocation: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by birddog114 on Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:43 pm
 wendellt wrote:yeah the 50mm 1.4 is a fantastic lenswomen love staring down it's short but utterly charming barell.
 Women will like the 85/1.4, it's bigger and sharper!  Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
 
			
				 birddog114
Senior Member Posts: 15881Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pmLocation: Belmore,Sydney 
 
		
		
			
			
 by wendellt on Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:53 pm
 Birddog114 wrote:Women will like the 85/1.4, it's bigger and sharper!  
 I agree Birdy
 When wer'e talking lenses Size definately matters! 
			
				 wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.) Posts: 4078Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 amLocation: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by KerryPierce on Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:22 am
 Both are nice shots, Peter, but I like the impish grin you got with the 2nd shot.    
			
				 KerryPierce
Senior Member Posts: 1233Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pmLocation: Detroit, MI
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Geoff on Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:34 am
 Love the shots Pete, and the 2nd one really does it for me too. I think your idea about an SB-800 meet here in Sydney is an excellent idea!   
			
				 Geoff
Moderator Posts: 7791Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 amLocation: Freshwater -  Northern Beaches, Sydney.
				
			 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |