anyone feel like a bit of crit

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

anyone feel like a bit of crit

Postby jamesw on Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:29 am

Image

from a technical standpoint i've nailed the trick, perfect timing. the lighting is also good imo.

anyone got opinion to offer?

for the record, he has gone up the ramp, done this trick, then landed going backwards down the ramp. turndown to fakie for anyone who knows bmx.
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby BT*ist on Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:28 am

That pose looks very unnatural - without the description I would have suggested some kind of corrective medical procedure for the rider! (Also.. the rear wheel is quite obscured so it almost looks like he's riding a unicycle :shock: )

It looks like a REALLY tricky shot to take, and it was taken in the dark, so well done!
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
User avatar
BT*ist
Senior Member
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:03 pm

Let me be quite blunt here James ...

I intenesly dislike this style of photography. The subject holds less than no interest for me at all, and thus I will pass by most images of this genre.

In fact, I'll probably cross the road to try to avoid them.

Most of them.

This one, though, is different. I'm not sure why, or what you've done differently in capturing this one, but it's good. Bloody good.

But that's just my humble opinion.

Well done. You got me to open the page.

Twice. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby jamesw on Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:09 pm

gstark wrote:Let me be quite blunt here James ...

I intenesly dislike this style of photography. The subject holds less than no interest for me at all, and thus I will pass by most images of this genre.

In fact, I'll probably cross the road to try to avoid them.

Most of them.

This one, though, is different. I'm not sure why, or what you've done differently in capturing this one, but it's good. Bloody good.

But that's just my humble opinion.

Well done. You got me to open the page.

Twice. :)


jesus gary, i started off reading that thinking

"why on earth is gary critting this if he doesn't even want to look at it"

and finished reading it with a huge smile on my face

i sent a copy of the high res to a mag editor and it's getting published. :twisted:
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby BT*ist on Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:43 pm

jamesw wrote:i sent a copy of the high res to a mag editor and it's getting published. :twisted:


Awesome!! Congratulations!
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
User avatar
BT*ist
Senior Member
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Postby xorl on Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:23 pm

I like the lighting too, in particular, how it shows the form of the ramps - very lunar :). However I find the shadow (something else as well?) hiding the rider's face distracting.
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby DavidR on Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:58 pm

well what a suprise, another photo at city skate! haha. nah looks good jimmy. think it may have been better if you were higher for a clearer view seeing as hes partially obscured by the bars but thats my only crit. whos publishing it?
User avatar
DavidR
Member
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Unley Adelaide

Postby Critter on Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:47 pm

Everyone is always looking for a bit of crit(ter) :(

8)
Chris
D300 | D80 | 14-24 f/2.8 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 35 f/2 | 105VR f/2.8 | 18-200VR | SB600 | R1 | GP-1 |
User avatar
Critter
Member
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Bardon, Brisbane

Postby jamesw on Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:09 am

DavidR wrote:well what a suprise, another photo at city skate! haha. nah looks good jimmy. think it may have been better if you were higher for a clearer view seeing as hes partially obscured by the bars but thats my only crit. whos publishing it?


only thing about going higher is the trick looks smaller.

2020 are publishing it next issue, profile on ryan.
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques