#1

#2

#3

#4

melted chocolate chick C&CModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
melted chocolate chick C&Canother set from saturday. interested get feedback and details of areas of improvement.
#1 ![]() #2 ![]() #3 ![]() #4 ![]()
Rightio... I'll comment Bruce. Please don't take offense if I say anything too harsh.
Something about your colour is really off. You really need to get your screen calibrated as she is looking very much like an Oompa Loompa colour wise. I think #3 is your best out of them. She's got an inviting smile and the composition is the best out of them. #1 has a decent composition, but I'm more attracted to the negative space in your image (the white space) in that one as it seems to dominate the image more shape wise. #2 and #4 should be cropped tighter. At the moment, they're unbalanced. Crop the legs so that they're balanced, not just cropped. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Can't say that the concept grabs me..but a glass bowl and spoon may emphasise the chocolate more. The stainless steel bowl and the hybrid spoon doesn't work for me. Model is cute though.
![]()
I agree with Leigh about the color. The whole scene looks cold: lighting in the back, white hair, SS bowl and mismatched spoon. My favorite would be the first one. A couple more things I find distracting are the white socks and the cook top. Again I am no expert and this is just my opinion.
Cheers, Gerard
What is it you are trying to achieve with the images? Is it meant to be erotica? Are you trying to say that melted chocolate is fun? Don't wear white when dealing with chocolate?
I think that is the problem I have with the images is that I don't know what they are showing me - other than a hot chick doing something. I also find her hair somewhat distracting. Maybe it is her natural colour, but it looks a bit "blue rinse" for me. She's not Dame Edna's niece, is she? As with Leigh's comments, mine are not meant to cause offence.
I really like the concept in these 2 sets.... but im probably biased towards beautifull women just lookin pretty!
One thing with this set, i think it'd probably work well if the entire kitchen was lit up evenly. Other than that, you probably don't need to crop as tight, it can always be done in PP later. Other than that its a good set.... but where are the pics when things get "messy!" MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au http://www.mattyo.com.au WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography http://www.circlework.com.au CAMS Accreditated D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
she is uber hot
![]() owwwwwwww post more ![]() body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
very early in my time in here someone said, "its easy to take nice pictures of beautiful women". I keep that in mind, each time, so that I improve my photography ahead of that thought. Agree with the cropping, its a bad habit. Lighting was a mix of sunlight through the large white window, and flash. As the clouds come and go, the lighting was difficult to control. Antsl had a good suggestion to do it at night, with the flash outside the window, and that would give me better control. As for the messy pics ![]()
these are her pics, for her portfolio. I've heard you can see some of them in FHM.
thanks ATJ, agree, and have been working hard on my color management. you may see her skin tones as very warm, its close to actual, WB is set with a grey card, and this should be as close to actual. The hair color is her choice, so not something I could influence. Back onto your good question of objective/theme, well, we were aiming to reproduce an idea we had seen, so lots of the ideas came from that. Our intention was to shoot a cheeky shot, in beauty/glam, of a "I shouldnt be doing this" concept (non sexual). I feel we acheived this, but lots to improve on a variety of areas.
thanks, I appreciate your feedback. I hadnt thought much about the bowl and spoon. we put these props together the morning off, from what we had available, but I can see your point, and will keep that in mind for next time.
agree, she is learning, and we will discuss that more next time. good solid feedback, thanks!!!
the body reminds me off my wife, yeah I'm still pinching myself, but the hair reminds of an old women pushing a trolley full of aluminium cans around the burbs.
no 1 is best pose by far, prob based purely on her expression. The other 3 if you crop out the bowl are great head shots, but the expression doesn't suit the scene. and she a tad orange, like others have mentioned. Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|