


And my friend wasn't safe either.

Warning Digital ArtModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Warning Digital ArtA few bored self portraits. Playing around with some different effects.
![]() ![]() ![]() And my friend wasn't safe either. ![]()
Craig, interesting...
The B&W shot is great - lighting, pose, reflections in sunnies, all very good. What PP did you do for that one? Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Thanks Chris
![]() I was using Cutout in CS2 for the geometric ones. The Black and White, was using Sheri's Sketch Action dl'ed from http://www.atncentral.com/Pages/SheriSketchPS.htm
I like you as a Cubist work of art there Craig.
Now all you need to do is find a few naked women and you can make your own Les Demoiselles D'Avignon... except with you in the mix. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Criag .... nice
I do like the B&W ... I do think you've taken it just past the edge in terms of sharpening though. Looks bloody good though. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Your right I had a closer look and it is oversharpened, its fast resize action doesn't suit these sorts of works its made for me more standard images.
Daniel I have to confess with the last one the cutout alone didn't seem to work for me, so I took the same shot and used some other filters and processing to get a fine line sketch and then did some fiddling with the two layers until I got a result I liked that had the overal layout and colour of the cutout, but also had the finer details of the sketch.
i like the first and the third, i like the effect in the first adn the third is tastefully done.
the jury is still out on the second and the forth for me. i dont know why. purrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrdy ![]() body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
The first is pretty abstract looking. Don't mind it too much.
The second, I think you've lost a bit there as the blend seems to give too much of a 2 dimensional feel to it for me. The third I really like, the pose, the conversion, exposure, Gary is right on second looks it is a little too sharpened, perhaps doing the sharpening when you have resized for this one? Still this is the best of the four for me! The fourth I think works better than the second. Shame about the highlight area on the RHS. Great work Craig!
I like the first, that may says allot about me though.......lol
Last edited by Cre8tivepixels on Fri Jun 08, 2007 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I really like that 3rd one mate! What sort of lighting setup did you have?
Im glad to see im not the only person taking pictures of myself... you need a shave more than i do! MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au http://www.mattyo.com.au WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography http://www.circlework.com.au CAMS Accreditated D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
These are actually old photos that I've decided to play with since RedBubble has me feeling all creative at the moment.
The lighting setup for that shot was single SB-800 off camera with SC-29 boncing of our yellow walled hallway. The black backdrop is material hanging off a door frame. I'll post the orginal (i'd shared it before).
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|