Cheers


Granted, they may be cliched, but they are my cliches

A couple more of AlexModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A couple more of AlexI won't bore you with too many photos of our new son, but here are a couple more.
Cheers ![]() ![]() Granted, they may be cliched, but they are my cliches ![]() Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Perfect Patrick!!
I think you are a long way off boring us at this stage - keep posting ![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
I thought this initially too Craig, but the softness absolutely works IMHO in this image! Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Thanks guys.
Craig, in the B&W shot, I used a filter which allowed me to choose a paper effect, and I chose a "very soft" paper, which results in a, you guessed it, very soft image. I probably could have gone for the "soft" effect, but thought this effect suited the image. Looking at it again, I think it may be a little too soft. I can change that and probably will. The shot was taken with Alex in the cot, head on his side, with the SB800 diffused through white blankets effective at Alex's belly, hence the dramatic light fall off. Unfortunately, the original shot had the blankets exposed a lot more than Alex's face. Cheers Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Second is bloody good. The detail is amazing.
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Thanks guys. I think the moral of the story is: stay in liquid for 9 months, and you will end up a prune!
![]() Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Patrick
You will never stop photographing your child! By the time he reaches his 21st birthday you will have over 5000 photographs of him. This is what cameras were made for. Congratulations and keep the images coming....we love them! Regards
Matt. K
Thanks Matt. 5000 over 21 years is only about 240 pa - I think we will easily meet your forecast of over 5,000. I just wonder what kind of camera we will be using at his 21st? Bronica ETRS, Rollei TLR or Hasselblad HD24 (perhaps, by then, Nikon may come out with a DSLR that takes high ISO shots with minimal noise?). Cheers Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
On the contrary...On the contrary, I like both images, Patrick. I guess the foot of the baby was covered in talcum powder? The first picture is soft, but it adds tenderness and enhances the fragility of the subject; while the second is a contrast of scales and skins. You are getting me ideas for in a couple of weeks I am off to Spain where I will meet my new born nephew. I am hopping I can take pictures of him half as good as yours.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|