A couple more of Alex

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A couple more of Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:34 pm

I won't bore you with too many photos of our new son, but here are a couple more.

Cheers

Image

Image

Granted, they may be cliched, but they are my cliches :lol:
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Geoff on Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:36 pm

Perfect Patrick!!
I think you are a long way off boring us at this stage - keep posting :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:37 pm

First is a bit soft for me, but still lovely, the second is a pealer, lovely!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Geoff on Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:38 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:First is a bit soft for me, but still lovely, the second is a pealer, lovely!


I thought this initially too Craig, but the softness absolutely works IMHO in this image!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:43 pm

Thanks guys.

Craig, in the B&W shot, I used a filter which allowed me to choose a paper effect, and I chose a "very soft" paper, which results in a, you guessed it, very soft image. I probably could have gone for the "soft" effect, but thought this effect suited the image.

Looking at it again, I think it may be a little too soft. I can change that and probably will.

The shot was taken with Alex in the cot, head on his side, with the SB800 diffused through white blankets effective at Alex's belly, hence the dramatic light fall off. Unfortunately, the original shot had the blankets exposed a lot more than Alex's face.

Cheers
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Old Bob on Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:00 am

Beautiful Patrick. The second one is very captivating and cleverly done.

Bob
User avatar
Old Bob
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:18 pm
Location: Parkes NSW

Postby Pehpsi on Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:08 am

Second is bloody good. The detail is amazing.
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:16 am

Thanks guys. I think the moral of the story is: stay in liquid for 9 months, and you will end up a prune! :lol:
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Matt. K on Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:22 pm

Patrick
You will never stop photographing your child! By the time he reaches his 21st birthday you will have over 5000 photographs of him. This is what cameras were made for. Congratulations and keep the images coming....we love them!
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:20 pm

Matt. K wrote:Patrick
You will never stop photographing your child! By the time he reaches his 21st birthday you will have over 5000 photographs of him. This is what cameras were made for. Congratulations and keep the images coming....we love them!


Thanks Matt. 5000 over 21 years is only about 240 pa - I think we will easily meet your forecast of over 5,000.

I just wonder what kind of camera we will be using at his 21st? Bronica ETRS, Rollei TLR or Hasselblad HD24 (perhaps, by then, Nikon may come out with a DSLR that takes high ISO shots with minimal noise?).

Cheers
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

On the contrary...

Postby zafra52 on Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:09 pm

On the contrary, I like both images, Patrick. I guess the foot of the baby was covered in talcum powder? The first picture is soft, but it adds tenderness and enhances the fragility of the subject; while the second is a contrast of scales and skins. You are getting me ideas for in a couple of weeks I am off to Spain where I will meet my new born nephew. I am hopping I can take pictures of him half as good as yours.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4857
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques