




Nana Judy backstageModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Nana Judy backstageSome backstage photos at Nana Judy launch on Friday night. Once again it was a club environment with bugger all lighting so had to make do with what I had. All shots were at ISO1600 and f4. I really should have stuck the flash in manual mode but in a rush, I left it in TTL
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
hey
got some nice setups in the first 2 great treatment and tone you got the look right but i think especially for streetwear the setup in number 2 is a bit passive they look like pretty wild people you should of got them doing the wild thing lots of attitiude that would of suited the streetwear theme and i think ttl mode on the flash is fine im assuming you couldn't bounce the light anywhere because the walls were brown and the ceilling may have been black which is great for mood but useless for fancy flash rebounding tricks Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Wayne
These are a good group of images, but I guess you know that ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks for the comments everyone.
Stubbsy and Wendell - points taken on board. The room was pretty dark and there wasn't much chance in bouncing the light off. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
hi
i really really like the first shot, the light and what you have done to the tones. excellent check my website>> http://www.6701.sunpixs.com
Wayne, Peter has echoed my thoughts concisely so I won't say too much.
I presume you had the one flash on camera? (I couldn't read in your description if it was on or off camera, if you did mention ![]() Patrick Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|